Re: [java-gnome-hackers] Libraries vs Packaging (1): Linkage

[Philipp H. <phi...@gm...>]

Hey there,

I was just wondering, since there is no "best" option in sight ...
What's the harm for you guys to add the --with-module=(..) option? It
doesn't change the default behavior of the library...

Cheers,
Philipp

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Andrew Cowie
<an...@op...> wrote:
> As an aside,
>
> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:19 -0300, Francisco Ortiz wrote:
>
>> - using a factory: its a derivative of the previous one, but cleaner.
>> The factory is responsible of provide the correct implementation, it
>> will return a class that implements an interface which can be the real
>> implementation or the mocked/not supported by the system one. Again ,
>> its more code but cleaner.
>
> If we had done an interface based design for 4.0, as I originally
> considered, then this would be a snap. But interfaces didn't work out,
> and changing our entire public API to interfaces-only at this point
> would be ... messy. Like 5.0 messy.
> http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/4.0/doc/design/5a-Architecture.html
>
> I mean, go ahead if you want, but it's about 2 years work. Just thought
> I'd let you know. :)
>
> AfC
> Sydney
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger.
> Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
> secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
> Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> java-gnome-hackers mailing list
> jav...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers
>
>