Re: [java-gnome-hackers] Clutter Bindings

[Andrew C. <an...@op...>]

On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 23:10 +1000, jan wrote:

> Clutter requires calling gtk_clutter_init() instead of gtk_init() so

_instead_?

How inconvenient of them.

> I've added Gtk.initClutter()

I imagine that we'll prefer:

        Clutter.init(args);
        
and then some guard logic elsewhere.

That said, there is an enormous amount of additional (very important)
stuff that is done during our call to what we call GtkMain.gtk_init(),
so this won't be trivial.

I'll chat with you about this next time we catch up on IRC.

> I made the Color constructor take ints instead of bytes because
> Color(0, 0, 0) is nicer than Color((byte)0, (byte)0, (byte)0). Is this
> bad style?

Um, Color already has 

        public <init>(int, int, int);

so I'm not sure what you're talking about there.


> Some of the classes are derived from GInitiallyUnowned but in the
> bindings I made them derive from Object. Will this cause problems? 

No, that'll behave. We have a lot of code that deals with those
permutations, but if it decides to act up we'll set Vreixo on it. :)

AfC
Sydney