Re: [java-gnome-hackers] Coverage for GtkSourceView

[Andrew C. <an...@op...>]

On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 11:42 +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> I just wanted to tell you that I started to work on coverage for the
> GtkSourceView API.

Great!

> I am using the package org.gnome.gtksourceview. Is
> that ok?

There is no hard and fast rule for our package space; we have, for
example, trimmed the lib- prefix off of a few things [libwnck has become
org.gnome.wnck, same with libglade -> org.gnome.glade, etc].

And I've also been wondering what to do with GtkSpell, thinking
org.gnome.spell would be about right. This is mostly because I'd kinda
like to keep org.gnome.gtk by itself without other things hanging off of
it, but whatever.  This part is all a bit subjective :)

So org.gnome.sourceview would be my pick, but you guys make the
decision.

AfC
Sydney

P.S. You might want to grab my 'poppler' branch and have a peek; it's
much larger but an example of what has to happen off the blocks to add a
new library.