Re: [java-gnome-hackers] release candidate

[Andrew C. <an...@op...>]

On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 07:25 +0200, Serkan Kaba wrote:

> Sorry I was wrong in the initial finding -O2 reveals the issue.

Yup, I can duplicate it now. Well done.

Of course I'm none the wiser what that problem means. I wonder what
we're doing wrong.

> I'll investigate why it does in the evening.

Thanks! This is just the sort of thing that can really screw up other
people, so I'd like to clear it up if we can.

My guess would be that we're doing the idiom of using the JavaVM pointer
incorrectly, or are caching it incorrectly, or...

AfC
Sydney