Thread: [java-gnome-hackers] Style schemes for GtkSourceview
Brought to you by:
afcowie
From: cyber p. <cyb...@gm...> - 2012-02-01 14:27:00
Attachments:
style-schemes-for-gtksourceview.patch
|
Hello, I have just added coverage for style scheme use in GtkSourceView. In the attachment, you will find the associated patch. Best regards, Georgios Migdos. |
From: cyber p. <cyb...@gm...> - 2012-02-06 11:27:55
|
Hello again, I would like to ask for some feedback on this patch (do I have to fix something to have it accepted ?). Best regards, Georgios Migdos. On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, cyber python <cyb...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > I have just added coverage for style scheme use in GtkSourceView. > > In the attachment, you will find the associated patch. > > Best regards, > Georgios Migdos. |
From: Guillaume M. <res...@gm...> - 2012-02-06 11:38:58
|
This patch looks ok to me. Just a couple of things that you could fix easily. 1. re-run the code formatter (some javadoc comments are not well indented) 2. for the classes where you do not define a public constructor maybe you should make the default constructor "private" to avoid someone to do "new Something()". Once these things fixed, the patch would be mergeable :) -- Guillaume Mazoyer - http://respawner.fr/ |
From: Guillaume M. <res...@gm...> - 2012-02-07 04:08:41
Attachments:
styleschemes-for-sourceview.patch
|
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: cyber python <cyb...@gm...> Date: 2012/2/6 Subject: Re: [java-gnome-hackers] Style schemes for GtkSourceview To: Guillaume Mazoyer <res...@gm...> I think I've got it right this time. See the attachment for the patch. On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Guillaume Mazoyer <res...@gm...> wrote: > This patch looks ok to me. > Just a couple of things that you could fix easily. > > 1. re-run the code formatter (some javadoc comments are not well indented) > 2. for the classes where you do not define a public constructor maybe > you should make the default constructor "private" to avoid someone to > do "new Something()". > > Once these things fixed, the patch would be mergeable :) > > -- > Guillaume Mazoyer - http://respawner.fr/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Try before you buy = See our experts in action! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 > _______________________________________________ > java-gnome-hackers mailing list > jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers -- Guillaume Mazoyer - http://respawner.fr/ |
From: Guillaume M. <res...@gm...> - 2012-02-07 04:10:02
Attachments:
styleschemes-for-sourceview.patch
|
Here is the patch that I would actually propose. -- Guillaume Mazoyer - http://respawner.fr/ |
From: Andrew C. <an...@op...> - 2012-02-13 00:28:57
|
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 05:09 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer wrote: > Here is the patch that I would actually propose. Merged to 'mainline' AfC Sydney |
From: Georgios M. <cyb...@gm...> - 2012-04-03 20:03:26
|
On 02/13/2012 02:28 AM, Andrew Cowie wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 05:09 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer wrote: >> Here is the patch that I would actually propose. > Merged to 'mainline' > > AfC > Sydney Hello everyone! I was browsing through the code in mainline ( http://research.operationaldynamics.com/bzr/java-gnome/mainline/src ) using the web interface and it seems that the patch has not been applied. |
From: Andrew C. <an...@op...> - 2012-04-04 15:53:52
|
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 23:03 +0300, Georgios Migdos wrote: > > Merged to 'mainline' > > And so it was; if you'd done $ bzr missing --line bzr://research.operationaldynamics.com/bzr/java-gnome/mainline/ you'd have seen your patch was there. In this case, sorry, after pushing I have to manually do `bzr update` on the working copy checkout on that server; `bzr push` doesn't do that automatically [which I find annoying, alas]. Sometimes I haven't quite managed to get around to it. Thanks for checking. AfC Sydney |
From: Georgios M. <cyb...@gm...> - 2012-04-04 16:29:31
|
On 04/04/2012 06:26 PM, Andrew Cowie wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 23:03 +0300, Georgios Migdos wrote: >>> Merged to 'mainline' >>> > And so it was; if you'd done > > $ bzr missing --line bzr://research.operationaldynamics.com/bzr/java-gnome/mainline/ > > you'd have seen your patch was there. > > In this case, sorry, after pushing I have to manually do `bzr update` on > the working copy checkout on that server; `bzr push` doesn't do that > automatically [which I find annoying, alas]. Sometimes I haven't quite > managed to get around to it. Thanks for checking. > > AfC > Sydney > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > java-gnome-hackers mailing list > jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers Thanks for the quick reply! |