Il mar, 2003-12-02 alle 18:50, Mark Howard ha scritto:
> This looks very good to me. If other bindings are going to be more
> official, then we definitely should.
> I'm just subscribing to language-bindings and will read the archives
> regarding this when I get chance (next week).
>
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:15:26PM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote:
> > Could somebody on the team please tak a look at this and
> > report back on the proposal.
>
> I'm still at uni and have a lot of work for the next few days so haven't
> read it in detail yet.
>
> It looks like they want the language bindings to follow release
> schedules, etc of gnome but be developed in parallel to gnome, rather
> than being in the main group of tarballs collectively known as the gnome
> desktop.
>
> This email doesn't go into details about levels of implementation of the
> many gnome APIs - we need to know more about what they require.
>
> One final important point (for this week, at least): Having java-gnome
> in this would also probably allow java-gnome applications be accepted
> into the gnome platform. In general, I think joining this group would be
> very beneficial for java-gnome.
Totally agreed, we should try to get in their schedule.
This would be beneficial e.g. when I'll try to get the bindings included
in Fedora. The only question is: how distributions could cope with a
package the requires a JDK to compile?
Mark, Debian community thoughts on this?
Luca.
--
Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...>
|
