Thread: [java-gnome-hackers] boxedFor() name clash - compiling java-gnome 4.1.1 with OpenJDK 1.7

[java-gnome-hackers] boxedFor() name clash - compiling java-gnome 4.1.1 with OpenJDK 1.7

From: Alexander B. <ab...@ro...> - 2011-12-06 21:38:04

Hello,

Rebuilding java-gnome 4.1.1 with javac 1.7.0_b147 (on what will become
Fedora 17) fails with this error:

src/bindings/org/gnome/gdk/Plumbing.java:69: error: name clash:
 boxedFor(Class<? extends Boxed>,long) in org.gnome.gdk.Plumbing and
 boxedFor(Class<?>,long) in org.gnome.glib.Plumbing have the same erasure,
 yet neither hides the other
    protected static Boxed boxedFor(Class<? extends Boxed> type, long pointer) {
                           ^

Adding "extends Boxed" to glib.Plumbing.boxedFor() makes it break
elsewhere, but if I instead remove it from gdk it does compile. Is that
the right fix?

/Alexander

Re: [java-gnome-hackers] boxedFor() name clash - compiling java-gnome 4.1.1 with OpenJDK 1.7

From: Andrew C. <an...@op...> - 2011-12-06 23:18:45

On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 22:16 +0100, Alexander Boström wrote:

> Adding "extends Boxed" to org.gnome.glib.Plumbing.boxedFor() makes it
> break elsewhere,

If you set the type of "type" to

	Class<? extends Boxed>

in each of the Boxed related methods in [org.gnome.glib] Plumbing it
compiles cleanly for me. Perhaps you could try that?

AfC
Sydney

Re: [java-gnome-hackers] boxedFor() name clash - compiling java-gnome 4.1.1 with OpenJDK 1.7

From: Serkan K. <se...@ge...> - 2011-12-07 04:48:58

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Could it be a duplicate of guava bug (well this is bug in javac I suppose)
See: http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/issues/detail?id=635

On 12/07/2011 12:18 AM, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 22:16 +0100, Alexander Boström wrote:
> 
>> Adding "extends Boxed" to org.gnome.glib.Plumbing.boxedFor() 
>> makes it break elsewhere,
> 
> If you set the type of "type" to
> 
> Class<? extends Boxed>
> 
> in each of the Boxed related methods in [org.gnome.glib] Plumbing 
> it compiles cleanly for me. Perhaps you could try that?
> 
> AfC Sydney
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> 
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
> This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist
> and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the
> pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now!
>  http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ 
> _______________________________________________ java-gnome-hackers 
> mailing list jav...@li... 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk7e8CkACgkQRh6X64ivZaJZhgCeLNjzcwxF3tR7V9vPyhgR+pzV
1M8An10/4IZpT//s3GzSea2TZsEcrWrJ
=nRWB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [java-gnome-hackers] boxedFor() name clash - compiling java-gnome 4.1.1 with OpenJDK 1.7

From: Alexander B. <ab...@ro...> - 2011-12-15 21:29:02

Attachments: extendsboxed.patch

ons 2011-12-07 klockan 10:18 +1100 skrev Andrew Cowie:

> If you set the type of "type" to
> 
> 	Class<? extends Boxed>
> 
> in each of the Boxed related methods in [org.gnome.glib] Plumbing it
> compiles cleanly for me. Perhaps you could try that?

Ok, see attached patch.

I haven't had time to install a VM with openjdk 1.7 to run it, but it
builds with openjdk 1.7 and builds and runs with openjdk 1.6.

/Alexander

Re: [java-gnome-hackers] boxedFor() name clash - compiling java-gnome 4.1.1 with OpenJDK 1.7

From: Alexander B. <ab...@ro...> - 2011-12-15 22:07:14

tor 2011-12-15 klockan 22:28 +0100 skrev Alexander Boström: 
> ons 2011-12-07 klockan 10:18 +1100 skrev Andrew Cowie:
> 
> > If you set the type of "type" to
> > 
> > 	Class<? extends Boxed>
> > 
> > in each of the Boxed related methods in [org.gnome.glib] Plumbing it
> > compiles cleanly for me. Perhaps you could try that?

There are also some public static Entity entityFor(Class<?> type, long
pointer) that look suspiciously similar. I'll have a look at that...

/Alexander

Re: [java-gnome-hackers] boxedFor() name clash - compiling java-gnome 4.1.1 with OpenJDK 1.7

From: Andrew C. <an...@op...> - 2011-12-15 23:42:19

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:28 +0100, Alexander Boström wrote:

> Ok, see attached patch.
> 
> 
Merged to 'mainline', thanks!

AfC
Sydney