Thread: [java-gnome-hackers] Coverage for GtkSourceView
Brought to you by:
afcowie
From: Stefan S. <ste...@gm...> - 2009-02-22 10:42:09
|
Hi, I just wanted to tell you that I started to work on coverage for the GtkSourceView API. I am using the package org.gnome.gtksourceview. Is that ok? Stefan |
From: Bruno D. <bdu...@be...> - 2009-02-22 11:09:35
|
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 11:42 +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to tell you that I started to work on coverage for the > GtkSourceView API. I am using the package org.gnome.gtksourceview. Is > that ok? > Hehe, I just wanted to do the same thing. If you need help ... -- Bruno Dusausoy <bdu...@be...> |
From: Stefan S. <ste...@gm...> - 2009-02-22 14:06:41
|
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 12:09 +0100, Bruno Dusausoy wrote: > Hehe, I just wanted to do the same thing. > If you need help ... Sure! I will try to finish the things that I started within the next days and post a bundle to the list. I am most interested in getting syntax highlighting to work, you could add other stuff if you like. Stefan |
From: Bruno D. <bdu...@be...> - 2009-02-25 20:21:50
|
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 15:06 +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 12:09 +0100, Bruno Dusausoy wrote: > > Hehe, I just wanted to do the same thing. > > If you need help ... > > Sure! I will try to finish the things that I started within the next > days and post a bundle to the list. I am most interested in getting > syntax highlighting to work, you could add other stuff if you like. > Ok. But I will first re-read the documentation about the bindings inner working. ;) Btw, are you idling on IRC sometimes ? -- Bruno Dusausoy <bdu...@be...> |
From: Stefan S. <ste...@gm...> - 2009-03-01 08:08:33
|
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 15:06 +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > Sure! I will try to finish the things that I started within the next > days and post a bundle to the list. I am most interested in getting > syntax highlighting to work, you could add other stuff if you like. All the work I have done so far is now available in a branch [1]. If you would like to test it or comment on it or even help me finishing it, that would be great. The classes can be found in the package org.gnome.sourceview. I added the defs files and some stubs and did enough coverage to use the API with syntax highlighting enabled. There is also a UnitTest and a simple example application. Stefan [1] bzr://research.operationaldynamics.com/bzr/java-gnome/hackers/schweizer/sourceview/ |
From: Andrew C. <an...@op...> - 2009-02-22 11:58:21
|
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 11:42 +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > I just wanted to tell you that I started to work on coverage for the > GtkSourceView API. Great! > I am using the package org.gnome.gtksourceview. Is > that ok? There is no hard and fast rule for our package space; we have, for example, trimmed the lib- prefix off of a few things [libwnck has become org.gnome.wnck, same with libglade -> org.gnome.glade, etc]. And I've also been wondering what to do with GtkSpell, thinking org.gnome.spell would be about right. This is mostly because I'd kinda like to keep org.gnome.gtk by itself without other things hanging off of it, but whatever. This part is all a bit subjective :) So org.gnome.sourceview would be my pick, but you guys make the decision. AfC Sydney P.S. You might want to grab my 'poppler' branch and have a peek; it's much larger but an example of what has to happen off the blocks to add a new library. |
From: Serkan K. <se...@ge...> - 2009-03-01 09:28:52
Attachments:
sourceview.patch
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Schweizer yazmış: > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 15:06 +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote: >> Sure! I will try to finish the things that I started within the next >> days and post a bundle to the list. I am most interested in getting >> syntax highlighting to work, you could add other stuff if you like. > > All the work I have done so far is now available in a branch [1]. If you > would like to test it or comment on it or even help me finishing it, > that would be great. The classes can be found in the package > org.gnome.sourceview. > > I added the defs files and some stubs and did enough coverage to use the > API with syntax highlighting enabled. There is also a UnitTest and a > simple example application. > > Stefan > > [1] > bzr://research.operationaldynamics.com/bzr/java-gnome/hackers/schweizer/sourceview/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > java-gnome-hackers mailing list > jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers > First of all thanks for this work. It's really a great addition to our covarage. I didn't deeply looked into it but fixed two things I spotted in my initial basic review. I added gtksourceview to configure script for Gentoo. (Other distros? Maybe Andrew can add for Ubuntu) I also made the example to work in project root. I'm attaching a bundle with my fixes. - -- Sincerely, Serkan KABA -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmqVUUACgkQRh6X64ivZaI+nwCeJz83UaH97Ae2xCSBuaC0vTJJ 3/wAnipn+nH+AqhwSRq2mN95DpE8cSOJ =dPLE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Andrew C. <an...@op...> - 2009-03-01 10:10:45
|
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 11:28 +0200, Serkan Kaba wrote: > (Other distros? Maybe Andrew can add for Ubuntu) No, I was only using Ubuntu while I was borrowing someone else's laptop. I'm happily back on Gentoo now. AfC Sydney |