Thread: RE: [java-gnome-hackers] build problems - plus TODO items

Brought to you by: afcowie

java-gnome-hackers

RE: [java-gnome-hackers] build problems - plus TODO items

From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-03-01 21:46:17

> The changes fixed it for me - it was failing every time 
> before (I had to
> manually edit configure to get it to run)
> 
> What's the exact error you're getting? (and where is 
> libgcj.jar located
> on your system?)


The problem is that gcj is located in
/usr/share/gcc-data/i686pc-linux-gnu/3.3/java on my system
(gentoo).  The directories we are using for the test do not
even exist on my system.

Here are the remaining items that should be fixed prior
to the beta:

1) gcj.jar checks that work for all developers
2) doc-core/Makefile.in.in that discovers all files in the
build-faq directory for the installation
3) doc-gnome/Makefile.in.in that discovers all files in the
build-tutorial directory for the installation
4) fix to event handling so it handles array of ints so the
rows_reordered event will propotage properly (I will work on
this).
5) fix a bug in the ActionGroup code (I will work on this).
6) load the native gtkhtml, gconf, and vte libs when they are
used.  Currently we do not execute a loadLibrary for these
libs so the examples fail.

I am handling items 4 and 5.  Please let me know if you can
work on one of the other items.

-Jeff

 NOTE: THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION. This transmission is intended
only for the use of the individuals or entity to which it is addressed. If
you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering
the message to the intended recipient, please return or delete it
immediately. Although this e-mail and any attachments are believed to be
free of any virus or other defect, it is the responsibility of the recipient
to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by us for
any loss or damage arising in any way from its unauthorized modification or
use.

RE: [java-gnome-hackers] build problems - plus TODO items

From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-03-02 13:47:30

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Howard [mailto:mh...@ca...]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 3:23 AM
> To: jav...@li...
> Subject: Re: [java-gnome-hackers] build problems - plus TODO items
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:06:27PM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 17:57, Mark Howard wrote:
> > > Is there any chance we can get the destroy and delete 
> events done too?
> > > 
> > > What do you think to adding a 
> > > boolean lifeCycleQuery( LifeCycleEvent event ) 
> > > method to LifeCycleListener?
> > > If this is ok, I can make the changes. 
> > > (but I hope you can think of a better method name)
> > 
> > 
> > How ablut just calling it lifeCycleEvent with a different
> > return type.  Whichever approach you choose please make
> > sure there is ample javadocs in the interface.
> 
> LifeCycleEvent still includes some events which do not 
> require a return
> value, so we'd still need the original callback method. Perhaps we
> should split this into two different event classes?
> 

I would prefer not to split it up.

-Jeff

 NOTE: THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION. This transmission is intended
only for the use of the individuals or entity to which it is addressed. If
you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering
the message to the intended recipient, please return or delete it
immediately. Although this e-mail and any attachments are believed to be
free of any virus or other defect, it is the responsibility of the recipient
to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by us for
any loss or damage arising in any way from its unauthorized modification or
use.