java-gnome-hackers

RE: [java-gnome-hackers] symlink

[Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...>]

The release is already out and the announcement has been sent.
Do you think we should wait until the next release (in two weeks)?

-Jeff

> Jeff-
>   I've just noticed that I accidentally removed the symlink lines for
> the java so files when sorting out the make system. I'm not able to
> change this at the moment, could you possibly do it before releasing
> 2.5.2?
> 
> It requires a patch like the one below for the install target of each
> module/Makefile.in.in 
>   
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 03:46:37PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > --- gtk/Makefile.in.in.orig	Sat Jan  3 15:37:23 2004
> > +++ gtk/Makefile.in.in	Sat Jan  3 15:42:30 2004
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >  	-$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(datadir)/doc/java-gnome-$(apiversion)
> >  	-$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/
> >  	$(INSTALL) -m644 
> lib/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion) $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/
> > +	@ln -s 
> $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion
> ) $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(apiversion).so
> >  	$(INSTALL) -m644 
> lib/gtk$(gtkapiversion)-$(gtkversion).jar 
> $(DESTDIR)$(datadir)/java-gnome
> >  	@ln -s gtk$(gtkapiversion)-$(gtkversion).jar 
> $(DESTDIR)$(datadir)/java-gnome/gtk$(gtkapiversion).jar
> >  	-for f in $(DOCUMENTS); do $(INSTALL) -m644 
> $(JG_DOC_DIR)/$$f 
> $(DESTDIR)$(datadir)/doc/java-gnome-$(apiversion); done
> 
> -- 
>   .''`. Mark Howard
>  : :' :
>  `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com 
>    `-   mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... 
> 

RE: [java-gnome-hackers] symlink

[Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...>]

> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 03:46:37PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > --- gtk/Makefile.in.in.orig	Sat Jan  3 15:37:23 2004
> > +++ gtk/Makefile.in.in	Sat Jan  3 15:42:30 2004
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >  	-$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(datadir)/doc/java-gnome-$(apiversion)
> >  	-$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/
> >  	$(INSTALL) -m644 
> lib/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion) $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/
> > +	@ln -s 
> $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion
> ) $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(apiversion).so

Is this correct or should it read:

	ln -s
$(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion)
$(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so


-Jeff

Re: [java-gnome-hackers] symlink

[Mark H. <mh...@ca...>]

I think it's only a minor bug so we can wait two weeks. We should
backport this (and any others?) to 0.8 though and release 0.8.3.

On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:51:40PM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote:
> Is this correct or should it read:
> 
> 	ln -s
> $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion)
> $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so
I really should check things more before sending them.

It should read:

ln -s libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion) $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so

(This creates a relative link, so the entire directory can be moved if
wanted without messing up the links)

One other thing I was going to propose:
I think we should add
  -rm $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so
before *all* ln lines.
When people install, they expect the new installation to be
automatically made the default. 
Any objections to this?

-- 
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com 
   `-   mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... 

Re: [java-gnome-hackers] symlink

[Luca De R. <pie...@li...>]

Il lun, 2004-01-05 alle 23:12, Mark Howard ha scritto:
> I think it's only a minor bug so we can wait two weeks. We should
> backport this (and any others?) to 0.8 though and release 0.8.3.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:51:40PM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote:
> > Is this correct or should it read:
> > 
> > 	ln -s
> > $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion)
> > $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so
> I really should check things more before sending them.
> 
> It should read:
> 
> ln -s libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion) $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so
> 
> (This creates a relative link, so the entire directory can be moved if
> wanted without messing up the links)
> 
> One other thing I was going to propose:
> I think we should add
>   -rm $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so
> before *all* ln lines.
> When people install, they expect the new installation to be
> automatically made the default. 
> Any objections to this?
It's ok for me, I've always hated when I had to move links from older to
newer version.
-- 
Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...>