Re: [Jason-users] A bug in term annotation?

[Burak K. <bbu...@gm...>]

Thank you so much, Jomi!
It worked with the use of  +temp(cold, U) <- +temp(cold)[mu(U]. I will use
it as a back-up way.

To make it as planned, I should dig into the BUF method.

Thank you.

Best regards.

Jomi Hubner <jom...@gm...>, 8 Nis 2024 Pzt, 14:13 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:

> to have a different belief update based on perception, you have to
> customise the BUF method of Agent class. This method
> “reads” the list of literals sent by the environment and updates the BB
> accordingly.
>
>
> > On 8 Apr 2024, at 09:10, Burak Karaduman <bbu...@gm...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jomi,
> >
> > I have already customised the selection functions. Is it possible to
> work with annoys, for example, if I extend/customise the belief base?
> >
> > Thank you so much.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > Jomi Hubner <jom...@gm...>, 8 Nis 2024 Pzt, 13:23 tarihinde şunu
> yazdı:
> > just an idea,
> >
> > keep perception as temp(cold, mu)
> >
> > add the plan
> >         +temp(cold, U) <- +temp(cold)[mu(U].
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 8 Apr 2024, at 08:20, Burak Karaduman <bbu...@gm...>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jomi,
> > >
> > > The problem is that I have done all my configurations based on this
> structure temp(cold)[mu(_)], i.e., anyTerm(_)[mu(_)]. Well, this can be the
> only way of doing this because all the customization in the background must
> be re-adapted, maybe. This is the last step and I am kind of stucked there
> :(. Is there a way to handle this or any workaround?
> > >
> > > Thank you so much.
> > >
> > > Best regards.
> > >
> > > Jomi Hubner <jom...@gm...>, 8 Nis 2024 Pzt, 13:09 tarihinde
> şunu yazdı:
> > > Hi Burak,
> > >
> > > currently, something is considered as new perception based only on
> terms, ignoring annotations. So, different annotations does not mean
> different perception. Indeed, when that agent-environment integration was
> conceived, the environment class provides literals without annotations.
> > >
> > > in your case, the “mu(.)” as a term should work.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Jomi
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 8 Apr 2024, at 07:02, Burak Karaduman <bbu...@gm...>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Jomi,
> > > >
> > > > I have an environment where I update a value in an annotated term.
> However, it only updates the value once. Do you think that this is a bug?
> > > >
> > > > double term_cold = new Random().nextDouble();
> > > >
> removePerceptsByUnif("myAgent",Literal.parseLiteral("temp(cold)[mu(_)]"));
> > > >         Literal literal_term_cold =
> Literal.parseLiteral("temp(cold)[mu("+term_cold+")]");
> > > >         addPercept("myAgent",literal_term_cold);
> > > > It deletes and adds temp(cold)[mu(_)]; however, the double value
> inside the mu is not updated and always stays the same.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Burak KARADUMAN,
> > > > Ph.D. Student at the University of Antwerp & Flanders Make, Modeling
> Intelligent Complex Software & Systems (MICSS-Lab),
> > > > G236, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Campus
> Middelheim,
> > > > Middelheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Burak KARADUMAN,
> > > Ph.D. Student at the University of Antwerp & Flanders Make, Modeling
> Intelligent Complex Software & Systems (MICSS-Lab),
> > > G236, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Campus
> Middelheim,
> > > Middelheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Burak KARADUMAN,
> > Ph.D. Student at the University of Antwerp & Flanders Make, Modeling
> Intelligent Complex Software & Systems (MICSS-Lab),
> > G236, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Campus
> Middelheim,
> > Middelheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
> >
>
>

-- 

*Burak KARADUMAN,*
Ph.D. Student at the University of Antwerp & Flanders Make,
Modeling Intelligent Complex Software & Systems (MICSS-Lab),
*G236, Department of **Computer Science**, Faculty of Science, Campus
Middelheim,*
Middelheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium