I thought this was already implemented (there was something they changed). I will ask on GitHub
The ASIO4All / Jamulus issue has been identified to Volker and the friends who write Jamulus code, so I guess if it was possible to improve things, it would already have been considered.
Thanks for your answer! So we should probably raise awareness on this issue.
Thanks for your interest and reply! It looks like the ASIO4All issue is still open (305 on github), and I can see nothing in the Jamulus change log that has addressed it. I last tested it on 18 December, on Jamulus 3.6.2, so I'm convinced it is still a problem people will see.
Hi John, Thanks for your answer! Ok. So it's more of a "try and restore" feature. I'd love to have an easier setup of ASIO4ALL. But I think, this issue has already been solved in the latest version of Jamulus? Isn't it possible to choose a different device now? If so, I think we should also open an issue on the Jamulus repo since this bug should be solved then.
Hi John, Ok. So it's more of a "try and restore" feature. I'd love to have an easier setup of ASIO4ALL. But I think, this issue has already been solved in the latest version of Jamulus? Isn't it possible to choose a different device now? If so, I think we should also open an issue on the Jamulus repo since this bug should be solved then.
Hi Rachel, As you can probably tell by the delay, I'm new to SourceForge and did not see your message until today. I had expected email contact from SourceForge for anything new, but that did not happen. if. Sorry. Jamulus Launcher makes no checks on the type of sound device. A Jamulus user can choose a device that won't work, just as they always could. What Jamulus Launcher offers is for a user to throw away that copy of Jamulus, and to start anew. Hopefully the user will select only 48kHz devices...
Hi, I just found this project and read thet it simplifies the ASIO4ALL setup. Does it only allow us to identify devices which don't support 48kHz or does it do more than that (e.g. check which inputs/outputs are correct)? Thanks for your work!