From: Michael M. <gh...@xt...> - 2002-10-15 21:47:16
|
Kewl. You will have to make changes for maven so probably dont want to go there. Maybe once maven gets a little more mature it would be easier. The key to maven is that you dont really have to learn much...just drop your code into the structure and it goes. Im doing some major refactoring at work, so ill have lots of Maven nous. Ill see if its possible to make the current structure for Jalopy fit into maven. I think it will with a super POM and sub POM's for all the plugins. Although i have to admit the current setup was very easy to get it up and running. I noticed that junit was there but didnt see any tests...are they coming or is that a pipedream. As I want things that arent there ill submit patches so if you could keep CVS update to date, I wont have to duplicate things you've done, and can do other things. :-D cheers Michael On Wednesday, 16 October, 2002 00:02, Marco Hunsicker wrote: > Hello Michael, > > Michael> 1) The implements value is indented improperly in CVS > > Michael> eg > > Michael> public class Wiggles > Michael> extends Foo > Michael> implements Fooable { > > Michael> when it should be > Michael> public class Wiggles > Michael> extends Foo > Michael> implements Fooable { > > I'll look at it, but I think my dev-version does it right (I will > commit changes soon) > > > Michael> 2) get an index out of bounds when printing an array > Michael> initialiser like this: (trys to access markers.getLast() > Michael> when there isnt one) > > Yep, showed up during my testing a few weeks ago. Already fixed on my > drive. But I'll look at your patch anyway. Maybe it is better. > > > Michael> 3) Praise :-D > Michael> It took me a little while to get my head around the source, > Michael> but I have to say its all very well done. > Michael> Good work. > > We're making our way to a first stable version. 1.0b9 will be a *big* > improvement as a german insurance company was willing to do *much* > field testing. > > > Michael> Any plans to move to Maven or Krysalis for the building. > Michael> Although you do have a nice setup already. > > And I'm quite satisfied with it. So it depends wether the current > process can be integrated into Maven whatever or I would have to apply > many changes. I like the docbook way of things and don't want to learn > just another idiom to provide some project documentation. Otherwise, > Maven looks very promising. -- Michael McCallum Software Engineer SnapHire Inc. http://www.SnapHire.com/ |