Re: [Jaffer-devel] Jaffer is much faster than Netatalk

[Stewart A. <st...@ne...>]

that's an interesting (and cool) datapoint. I wonder what the difference is.


Rick Mann wrote:
> I use Mac OS X connected to the 'Net via Sprint Broadband Direct, a
> line-of-site terrestrial wireless internet access solution.
> 
> The connection is very fast downstream, about 256 kbit upstream, and varying
> but usually high latency.
> 
> I connect to a linux box running Netatalk (and now Jaffer) in a Colo
> facility across the Bay. It's a PIII 750, not much RAM (256 MB I think). It
> has very little load.
> 
> A Finder window that takes 10 seconds to populate with Netatalk populates in
> 2 with Jaffer. Thank you. I'm eager to see what can happen with the New I/O
> stuff...