From: <jos...@ch...> - 2016-06-13 05:30:12
|
That means in the new version of JabRef all groups are dynamic? All the best Josef > > Tob...@gm... hat am 12. Juni 2016 um 16:31 geschrieben: > > > Dear Haines, > > I'm sorry for the problems you have with the way Jabref handles groups in > the new version. Let me explain what happened: > Previously, the group membership was stored at the end of the file in one > of these Jabref comments. This behaviour had some disadvantages, so we changed > it. Now Jabref rembers the group information in the bibtex entry itself > (BibEntry). So your entries now have a groups field (have a look at the bibtex > source), where the names of the static groups are saved. > Because only the names of the groups are stored in this new field, JabRef > can no longer differentiate between groups with the same name. This might be a > bit inconvienent, but you can fix it easily by giving the groups different > names and then manually correcting the assignments. > > I hope this helps for now. If you still experience problems, please post > them on github. https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues > Best, Tobias > > |