From: Bernhard K. <ber...@gm...> - 2016-06-12 12:22:55
|
Am 12.06.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Haines Brown: > I've complained several times in another thread, so far no response, > that JabRef 3.4 destroyed the @Comment{jabref-meta: groupstree: section > of my .bib databases. The group tree is present, but has lost all > keywords. > > I don't see how this could have happened through my blundering. I can > recover that section from all my databases from a backup when still > running JabRef 9.10 two weeks ago. I did this with a database, but a > major problem remains. If I create a new group, it is not added to the > groupstree, but is recorded somewhere else. Also, creating a link from > an entry to a group creates a link to all groups with the same name. > > Please!!! Someone tell me what's going on. Has a new group mechanism > been created? Where is that information being stored? Was it supposed to > recover groupstree data from the .bib databases? > > I'll have to create links from entries to groups by entering the > information into the databases by hand, but I worry that JabRef 3.4 will > again destroy that information. > > Haines Brown I know that there were changes in the group function. But I do not know whether your problem is related. My groups at least were maintained when I updated jabref to 3.4. Regards Bernhard |