ivupy-users Mailing List for IVuPy
Brought to you by:
gvermeul
Menu
▾
▴
ivupy-users — Discussion & help list for IVuPy users
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Gerard V. <ger...@ne...> - 2016-01-15 17:25:23
|
Hello, IVuPy is unmaintained and the company selling Coin3d is out of business. I think that it is still true that VTK requires more memory than Coin3d, because the difference was so enormous, but I was not sure. Gerard On 01/15/2016 01:55 AM, Zach wrote: > Hello: > > I read on the IVuPy website that pyvtk required more memory than Coin3d. It > seems like this website has not been updated for a long time. Is this still > the case regarding vtk vs coin3d in python? > > Thanks, > > Zach > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 > > > _______________________________________________ > Ivupy-users mailing list > Ivu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivupy-users |
|
From: Zach <za...@gm...> - 2016-01-15 00:55:23
|
Hello: I read on the IVuPy website that pyvtk required more memory than Coin3d. It seems like this website has not been updated for a long time. Is this still the case regarding vtk vs coin3d in python? Thanks, Zach |
|
From: Gerard V. <ger...@gr...> - 2008-08-14 17:56:44
|
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 22:41:27 +0200 "Pierre Raybaut" <co...@py...> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just discovered IVuPy through its website: it seems to be an > interesting project, very promising. > Do you still maintain it? > > In what terms would you compare IVuPy to TVTK? > > Thanks for your answer. > Regards, > Pierre Raybaut I made it for a company wanting to visualize the solutions of numerical differential equation solvers (1e6 nodes or more). The company is very happy with IVuPy. I do not use it myself, so I don't maintain it. However all SIP files have been generated by a Python script, so it may be "easy" to bring it up to date. The C++ headers of the Coin library are transformed to XML using gccxml, and the xml files to SIP files. Coin is very orthogonal, so it did not take much time (a few months of spare time). Coin is a scene graph library sitting on top of OpenGL. I have looked at several scene graph libraries and concluded that Coin was fast and easy to interface to Python. The company was using older wrappers around VTK and complaining that VTK was a memory hog. It is true that Coin is much faster than VTK for scenes with many nodes. I do not know TVTK. You may also look at Pivy. Pivy is based on SWIG and you may not be able to reimplement virtual C++ function. However, Pivy has other advantages. Regards -- Gerard |
|
From: Pierre R. <co...@py...> - 2008-08-05 20:41:17
|
Hi, I've just discovered IVuPy through its website: it seems to be an interesting project, very promising. Do you still maintain it? In what terms would you compare IVuPy to TVTK? Thanks for your answer. Regards, Pierre Raybaut |
|
From: Gerard V. <ger...@gr...> - 2006-02-22 08:11:52
|
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:36:41 +0100 co...@he... wrote: > Hi there > > I just started implementing a project in Python and Qt4.1 on Windows. > I need Qt > 4.0 as there is no open source license for 3.X on WIndows. > Although PyQt4 is not official yet, the snapshots work fine for me. > > My question now: Is IVuPy usable in this setting? Will it be usable? > Note that I'm new to Python/Qt, although I do have programming > background. > No, not yet. The future SIP-4.4 has rather different internals than the current SIP-4.3 and IVuPy depends quite a lot on the SIP internals. I have PyQwt running more or less with SIP-4.4 and PyQt4, but SIP-4.4 is still in a state of flux, and sometimes it produces unstable bindings. You may try http://sourceforge.net/projects/qtwin/ and http://kscraft.sourceforge.net/convert_xhtml.php?doc=pyqt-windows-install.xhtml with the latest SIP-4.3.2 and PyQt-3.15.1, but I do not know if it will work. I know somebody who has used it with PyQwt, and there are some minor problems. When PyQt4 is released I will port IVuPy to it. This will take me about 1 month of spare time. Gerard |
|
From: <co...@he...> - 2006-02-22 07:36:48
|
Hi there I just started implementing a project in Python and Qt4.1 on Windows. I need Qt > 4.0 as there is no open source license for 3.X on WIndows. Although PyQt4 is not official yet, the snapshots work fine for me. My question now: Is IVuPy usable in this setting? Will it be usable? Note that I'm new to Python/Qt, although I do have programming background. Thanks Stephan |