as you might have noticed already, I am trying to go through all the open
bugs/feature requests,discussions and try to get them into SVN as long as I
have knowledge about the topics there. Since there is a rule here on IT++not
to open a bug/feature request without prior discussion, I a posteriori start
the discussion, hoping that those albeit valuable requests/reports won't be
lost.
So i open up a discussion on feature request #3348928. qdelfin suggested
amending turbo.cpp/h by an additional (in add. to WCDMA/UMTS) interleaver
sequence generating function and already provided some code. I went through
that code and changed a bit, but since I cannot add it to the request, I will
post it here for discussion. Could you please verify that. Coding for LTE is
in the standard http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/Specs/latest/Rel-10/36_series/36212-a
50.zip
from page 14 onwards.
BTW: We should consider inheriting the special interleavers from
Sequence_Interleaver and not write a function for every special case. That
will require some changes in the method interface/constructors of the
Turbo_Codec class. What do you think?
Hi,
as you might have noticed already, I am trying to go through all the open
bugs/feature requests,discussions and try to get them into SVN as long as I
have knowledge about the topics there. Since there is a rule here on IT++not
to open a bug/feature request without prior discussion, I a posteriori start
the discussion, hoping that those albeit valuable requests/reports won't be
lost.
So i open up a discussion on feature request #3348928. qdelfin suggested
amending turbo.cpp/h by an additional (in add. to WCDMA/UMTS) interleaver
sequence generating function and already provided some code. I went through
that code and changed a bit, but since I cannot add it to the request, I will
post it here for discussion. Could you please verify that. Coding for LTE is
in the standard http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/Specs/latest/Rel-10/36_series/36212-a
50.zip
from page 14 onwards.
BTW: We should consider inheriting the special interleavers from
Sequence_Interleaver and not write a function for every special case. That
will require some changes in the method interface/constructors of the
Turbo_Codec class. What do you think?