Logged In: YES
user_id=1004597
Originator: YES
This bug is now fixed in SVN.
/ediap
By: Yngve Selén (yngveselen) - 2007-05-28 13:41
It seems like the function outer_product does not work according to the convention for complex vectors. I'd expect that outer_product(x,y) (where x and y are of the type cvec) would return
xy^H
(^H denoting Hermitian transpose). However, what you get instead get is
xy^T
so you have to use outer_product(x,conj(y)) to get the "conventional" outer product of vectors. I haven't found this "bug" documented anywhere.
Logged In: YES
user_id=1004597
Originator: YES
This bug is now fixed in SVN.
/ediap
Logged In: YES
user_id=1004597
Originator: YES
Errata:
The fix was reverted from the repository, since it brakes interface without notifying end users. We are working on a better solution for this issue.
Logged In: YES
user_id=1004597
Originator: YES
Finally this problem was fixed as follows:
1) In the current stable branch (3.10.x), we decided to only update documentation and do not change the code at all, mainly for backward compatibility. So the outer_product() of complex vectors x, y results in (x * y^T). One can use outer_product(x, conj(y)) to perform (x * y^H) operation.
2) In the development branch (3.99.x), an extra "hermitian" parameter has been added to this method:
Mat<T> outer_product(const Vec<T> &v1, const Vec<T> &v2, bool hermitian = false);
This parameter is ignored for vector types other than cvec. For complex vectors, a standard transposition of the second argument is performed by default for backward compatibility (hermitian = false). But one can explicitly choose a Hermitian transposition setting hermitian to true, e.g.:
cmat M = outer_product(v1, v2, true); // (v1 * v2^H)
Log in to post a comment.