|
From: Oswald B. <os...@kd...> - 2013-11-24 21:59:33
|
hi, On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 09:26:37PM +0000, Ignas Anikevičius wrote: > Are there any plans for support of the IDLE and PUSH extensions in > mbsync? > IDLE is being considered; it depends on the "daemon mode" item in the TODO list. there was a related thread on the list some months ago. PUSH seems to be vaporware for all i can tell. at it happens, today i read the RFCs for CONDSTORE and QRESYNC (which are actually implemented by gmail and certainly some others). with these extensions, polling is actually quite cheap, so that may be a viable alternative to IDLE. > am ready to help with it if there is an agreement, that it would be > beneficial to have the above functionality. > please familiarize yourself with the code a bit. when you have a basic grasp of the structure, you'll understand the challenge. we can discuss possible solutions at that point. :) |