From: Kevin M. <ke...@vr...> - 2002-01-22 22:39:18
|
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Chad Austin wrote: > Okay, I guess the question now is... where should the CVS organization doc go? > :) in the FAQ on the web site? I think all the docs should go there... the only bad thing is we don't get revision control on it, but it is a nicely managed FAQ area... > > And instead of |cvs co projects|, people could always do |cvs co > projects/myproject| > this is true... basically it was to make it easier to get a project (not as much typing). also having an aki module makes more sense than having a project module that aki is within - sinse aki is standalone. The lib module is different, since each project would depend on it, it would be easiest to put all common code there. I think organizing the repos for aesthetics might not be right, it isn't a directory structure, it is a collection of modules. (this isn't really a strong argument though..) The only hangup I have is that viewing the cvs source might become harder - but is this a good reason to have one module with all projects a part of it? kevin > > I think the current state is that the stuff in projects is getting moved > > to root, and the xdl dir is getting removed (because it is in the lib > > dir). > > > > ben and i were discussing this, and decided it would be annoying to check > > out the projects module and get everyone's project at once... > > > > > We need a document that describes where things go in CVS. I'm very much > > > confused. And as we all know, confusion means something should be written > > > down. :) > -- @--@---@---@----@-----@------@------@-----@----@---@---@--@ Kevin Meinert __ _ __ http://www.vrac.iastate.edu/~kevn \ || \| \ / ` Virtual Reality Applications Center \ ||.-'|--\\ Howe Hall, Iowa State University, Ames Iowa \|| \| \`__, ----------------------------------------------------------- |