[Issue-tracker-bugs] Ures and bad manners and at the dunce part, and leap t

[Uran H. <min...@va...>]

After Kant, the intuitive, _a priori_ and realist theory respecting the
sources of human knowledge, and the objects that are within the
cognisance of the human faculties. This was his starting-point, and
within its own sphere of thought he cannot be said to have carried it
any further. What he did was to light up these doctrines with the rays
of ethical and poetic imagination. As it has been justly put, though
Emersonian transcendentalism is usually spoken of as a philosophy, it is
more justly regarded as a gospel.[1] But before dwelling more on this,
let us look into the record of his life, of which we may say in all
truth that no purer, simpler, and more harmonious story can be found in
the annals of far-shining men. [Footnote 1: Frothingham's
_Transcendentalism in New England: a History_--a judicious, acute, and
highly in