Menu
▾
▴
ispman-users — General discussion about ispman usage
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(42) |
Jun
(61) |
Jul
(46) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(87) |
May
(80) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(46) |
Sep
(106) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(101) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(92) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(88) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(119) |
Oct
(131) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(108) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(110) |
Feb
(103) |
Mar
(92) |
Apr
(197) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(86) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(37) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(50) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(12) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(7) |
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: <joh...@ti...> - 2011-05-03 05:35:53
|
ispconfig 3 supports multiple servers. Some things are counter-intuitive to me, and the overall architecture isn't what I'd prefer (mysql vs ldap as a backend, etc) but even at that it seems more "stable" at this point than ispman. It needs some more polish, but I think it might turn out to be a good replacement some time down the road. One of my main problems with ispconfig 3 is that I don't trust the sanity-checking of the UI. I seem to remember that mistakenly entering something wrong in the DNS UI (either through a typo or by making a wrong assumption about how it worked) caused the DNS server to shut down due to incorrect zone file syntax. Since administration of specific DNS zones can be delegated to end-users, this is not a good state of affairs. There are other problems - i really dislike the inability to assign users to other resellers once they've been set up. There may be other problems, as I haven't dug into it deep enough. Overall it is starting to look ok. Its good enough for me, knowing how to work around some of its shortcomings. Br, J > Atif, > > There is always interest. ISPman has been pretty dead for several years > but it fills my needs very well. It excels at supporting mail servers > that process large numbers of emails. Each of my MX boxes currently > process more then 500,000 emails a day. That includes Amavis, SA, > ClamAV, etc as well using LDAP for everything under postfix. Even will > all that running on the boxes there is still room to grow on the boxes. > These are PIV boxes not power houses. I have no doubt a new system > with decent IO could do millions. > > Once we converted ispman-agent from the daemon that crashed all the time > to a cron task ispman just works and does what we need it to do. > Unfortunately I don't know perl well enough to make it a proper command > line option so I could submit a patch or I would. > > For the record I made the following changes to ispman-agent. > > Inside the file /opt/ispman/bin/ispman-agent I commented out the > following line. > > ## Change from Daemon to cron runable agent. > ## sleep( 60 * $agentFrequency ); > unlink $pid_file && exit(0); > > Then created a cron job to run the agent every 5 mins. You can reduce > the time down some but in my group we found that 5 min that always ran > on the numbers was predictable and manageable. > > /etc/cron.d/ispman_agent > #!/bin/bash > */5 * * * * root /opt/ispman/bin/ispman-agent nodetach > > PS I also added to following script on the master ldap system. For > nightly backups. It is simple but it keeps ldap happy. > /etc/cron.daily/ispman_daily_maintaince . Note I run the webservice and > master ldap on the same box so the script might has some dependence on > the full ispman install but I don't think so. > > Thanks > Robert > > On 12/18/2009 09:45 PM, Atif Ghaffar wrote: >> If there is interest, I can revive the isp-director codebase to a state >> where it is as usuable as the ispman project. >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:05 PM, anebi.bg <http://anebi.bg>@gmail.com >> <http://gmail.com> <anebi.bg <http://anebi.bg>@gmail.com >> <http://gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> i have checked some months ago different panels like ispCP and >> ispConfig, but i really didn't find any better application like >> architectures and organization of things inside like ISPMan. >> >> I remember that Atif Ghaffar was started isp-director project, but >> it >> looks that it will not continue to be developed as Atif informed >> already. >> >> We are still using ISPMan, but we are also looking for an good >> alternative. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community >> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support >> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast >> and easy >> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Ispman-users mailing list >> Isp...@li... >> <mailto:Isp...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >> >> >> >> >> -- >> best regards >> Atif Ghaffar >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community >> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support >> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and >> easy >> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ispman-users mailing list >> Isp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise > Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been > demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE > containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain > from the move. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails_______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > |
|
From: Robert M. <ro...@mi...> - 2011-04-23 21:40:10
|
I decided to turn my one line change into a proper patch and added a feature request. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358390&aid=3292176&group_id=8390 I am also attaching the patch. Thanks Robert On 04/23/2011 02:58 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote: > Atif, > > There is always interest. ISPman has been pretty dead for several years > but it fills my needs very well. It excels at supporting mail servers > that process large numbers of emails. Each of my MX boxes currently > process more then 500,000 emails a day. That includes Amavis, SA, > ClamAV, etc as well using LDAP for everything under postfix. Even will > all that running on the boxes there is still room to grow on the boxes. > These are PIV boxes not power houses. I have no doubt a new system > with decent IO could do millions. > > Once we converted ispman-agent from the daemon that crashed all the time > to a cron task ispman just works and does what we need it to do. > Unfortunately I don't know perl well enough to make it a proper command > line option so I could submit a patch or I would. > > For the record I made the following changes to ispman-agent. > > Inside the file /opt/ispman/bin/ispman-agent I commented out the > following line. > > ## Change from Daemon to cron runable agent. > ## sleep( 60 * $agentFrequency ); > unlink $pid_file && exit(0); > > Then created a cron job to run the agent every 5 mins. You can reduce > the time down some but in my group we found that 5 min that always ran > on the numbers was predictable and manageable. > > /etc/cron.d/ispman_agent > #!/bin/bash > */5 * * * * root /opt/ispman/bin/ispman-agent nodetach > > PS I also added to following script on the master ldap system. For > nightly backups. It is simple but it keeps ldap happy. > /etc/cron.daily/ispman_daily_maintaince . Note I run the webservice and > master ldap on the same box so the script might has some dependence on > the full ispman install but I don't think so. > > Thanks > Robert > > On 12/18/2009 09:45 PM, Atif Ghaffar wrote: >> If there is interest, I can revive the isp-director codebase to a state >> where it is as usuable as the ispman project. >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:05 PM, anebi.bg <http://anebi.bg>@gmail.com >> <http://gmail.com> <anebi.bg <http://anebi.bg>@gmail.com >> <http://gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> i have checked some months ago different panels like ispCP and >> ispConfig, but i really didn't find any better application like >> architectures and organization of things inside like ISPMan. >> >> I remember that Atif Ghaffar was started isp-director project, but it >> looks that it will not continue to be developed as Atif informed >> already. >> >> We are still using ISPMan, but we are also looking for an good >> alternative. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community >> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support >> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast >> and easy >> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Ispman-users mailing list >> Isp...@li... >> <mailto:Isp...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >> >> >> >> >> -- >> best regards >> Atif Ghaffar >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community >> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support >> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy >> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ispman-users mailing list >> Isp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise > Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been > demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE > containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain > from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users |
|
From: Robert M. <ro...@mi...> - 2011-04-23 19:16:38
|
Atif,
There is always interest. ISPman has been pretty dead for several years
but it fills my needs very well. It excels at supporting mail servers
that process large numbers of emails. Each of my MX boxes currently
process more then 500,000 emails a day. That includes Amavis, SA,
ClamAV, etc as well using LDAP for everything under postfix. Even will
all that running on the boxes there is still room to grow on the boxes.
These are PIV boxes not power houses. I have no doubt a new system
with decent IO could do millions.
Once we converted ispman-agent from the daemon that crashed all the time
to a cron task ispman just works and does what we need it to do.
Unfortunately I don't know perl well enough to make it a proper command
line option so I could submit a patch or I would.
For the record I made the following changes to ispman-agent.
Inside the file /opt/ispman/bin/ispman-agent I commented out the
following line.
## Change from Daemon to cron runable agent.
## sleep( 60 * $agentFrequency );
unlink $pid_file && exit(0);
Then created a cron job to run the agent every 5 mins. You can reduce
the time down some but in my group we found that 5 min that always ran
on the numbers was predictable and manageable.
/etc/cron.d/ispman_agent
#!/bin/bash
*/5 * * * * root /opt/ispman/bin/ispman-agent nodetach
PS I also added to following script on the master ldap system. For
nightly backups. It is simple but it keeps ldap happy.
/etc/cron.daily/ispman_daily_maintaince . Note I run the webservice and
master ldap on the same box so the script might has some dependence on
the full ispman install but I don't think so.
Thanks
Robert
On 12/18/2009 09:45 PM, Atif Ghaffar wrote:
> If there is interest, I can revive the isp-director codebase to a state
> where it is as usuable as the ispman project.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:05 PM, anebi.bg <http://anebi.bg>@gmail.com
> <http://gmail.com> <anebi.bg <http://anebi.bg>@gmail.com
> <http://gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i have checked some months ago different panels like ispCP and
> ispConfig, but i really didn't find any better application like
> architectures and organization of things inside like ISPMan.
>
> I remember that Atif Ghaffar was started isp-director project, but it
> looks that it will not continue to be developed as Atif informed
> already.
>
> We are still using ISPMan, but we are also looking for an good
> alternative.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast
> and easy
> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Ispman-users mailing list
> Isp...@li...
> <mailto:Isp...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> best regards
> Atif Ghaffar
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ispman-users mailing list
> Isp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users
|
|
From: Peter C. <pe...@ya...> - 2010-08-27 17:30:13
|
Ignacio: thank you. peter --- On Fri, 8/27/10, Ignacio García <ig...@oe...> wrote: > From: Ignacio García <ig...@oe...> > Subject: Re: [Ispman-users] State of ispman? > To: isp...@li... > Date: Friday, August 27, 2010, 3:13 AM > El 24/08/10 19:33, Peter > Curran escribió: > > Hi, > > Is Ispconfig3 really better? > I think it's different. For us ispman has worked very well > for many > years. However, it started to show its age some time ago. > Besides, the > fact that its development ceased some years ago forced us > to look for > alternatives. > > Ispconfig3 works very well, and the admin and customer > interfaces are > superior. However, they both do basically the same > (ispconfig supports > in addition setting up ftp, ssh accounts, and mysql db). > Ispconfig keeps > its data in a mysql db, where ispman does it in ldap. (I > wish ispconfig3 > could support other backends, such as postgres, or ldap as > well. I don't > like the idea of having postfix, apache depending on a > frequently > used/accessed service such as mysql). Ispconfig3 does a > good job > automagically configuring your software (email, web, > amavisd-new, etc. > services) so you can have a basic server configured in > minutes. > > 1. can it support cyrus Imap ? > Ispconfig officially supports Courier. I believe some work > is being done > to support dovecot. We thought it was kind of a regression > to go from > cyrus to courier, but courier has been performing fine > since then. > > 2. Is it enterprise ? > We are an ISP (a small one though) :) > > Please let me know. > > > > thank you, peter > > > > > > Regards, > > Ignacio > > > > > > --- On Sun, 12/27/09, Ignacio Garcia<ig...@oe...> > wrote: > > > >> From: Ignacio Garcia<ig...@oe...> > >> Subject: Re: [Ispman-users] State of ispman? > >> To: isp...@li... > >> Date: Sunday, December 27, 2009, 2:31 AM > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> El 17/12/09 18:05, ane...@gm... > >> escribió: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> i have checked some months ago different > panels like > >> ispCP and > >>> ispConfig, but i really didn't find any > better > >> application like > >>> architectures and organization of things > inside like > >> ISPMan. > >> > >> We still use ISPMan on 2 of our most "senior" > servers and > >> it works > >> great. However, for new servers we couldn't risk > >> implementing a solution > >> that is not being applied/tested against new > versions of > >> services, so we > >> decided to move to an opensource control panel > with a more > >> active > >> developement. We chose ISPConfig3, which uses > MySQL as > >> backend. We're > >> quite happy with its performance and features > which, since > >> we're talking > >> about a newer product, they clearly surpass > ISPMan, and > >> although MySQL > >> is not as fast as ldap, I must admit we like it > better > >> (I've never been > >> too passionate about ldap). > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Ignacio > >> > >> - -- > >> Ignacio García > >> ig...@oe... > >> E.S. Oenus S.L > >> Alfaro, 4 > >> 46701-Gandia > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > >> > >> > iEYEARECAAYFAks3G0MACgkQoYMx3fsuWura9gCguGvxFpJtAgp8YZ8nWB1dmLfk > >> K+0An2gOf6WIybwCyhSo9cLfbwP0Wte4 > >> =6j/s > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon > Developer > >> Community > >> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app > development > >> support > >> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app > >> distribution fast and easy > >> Join now and get one step closer to millions of > Verizon > >> customers > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Ispman-users mailing list > >> Isp...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > >> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) > Developer Program > > Be part of this innovative community and reach > millions of netbook users > > worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to > increase revenue and > > speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your > future. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d > > _______________________________________________ > > Ispman-users mailing list > > Isp...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) > Developer Program > Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of > netbook users > worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to > increase revenue and > speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > |
|
From: Ignacio G. <ig...@oe...> - 2010-08-27 08:30:38
|
El 24/08/10 19:33, Peter Curran escribió: > Hi, > Is Ispconfig3 really better? I think it's different. For us ispman has worked very well for many years. However, it started to show its age some time ago. Besides, the fact that its development ceased some years ago forced us to look for alternatives. Ispconfig3 works very well, and the admin and customer interfaces are superior. However, they both do basically the same (ispconfig supports in addition setting up ftp, ssh accounts, and mysql db). Ispconfig keeps its data in a mysql db, where ispman does it in ldap. (I wish ispconfig3 could support other backends, such as postgres, or ldap as well. I don't like the idea of having postfix, apache depending on a frequently used/accessed service such as mysql). Ispconfig3 does a good job automagically configuring your software (email, web, amavisd-new, etc. services) so you can have a basic server configured in minutes. > 1. can it support cyrus Imap ? Ispconfig officially supports Courier. I believe some work is being done to support dovecot. We thought it was kind of a regression to go from cyrus to courier, but courier has been performing fine since then. > 2. Is it enterprise ? We are an ISP (a small one though) :) > Please let me know. > > thank you, peter > > Regards, Ignacio > > > --- On Sun, 12/27/09, Ignacio Garcia<ig...@oe...> wrote: > >> From: Ignacio Garcia<ig...@oe...> >> Subject: Re: [Ispman-users] State of ispman? >> To: isp...@li... >> Date: Sunday, December 27, 2009, 2:31 AM >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> El 17/12/09 18:05, ane...@gm... >> escribió: >>> Hi, >>> >>> i have checked some months ago different panels like >> ispCP and >>> ispConfig, but i really didn't find any better >> application like >>> architectures and organization of things inside like >> ISPMan. >> >> We still use ISPMan on 2 of our most "senior" servers and >> it works >> great. However, for new servers we couldn't risk >> implementing a solution >> that is not being applied/tested against new versions of >> services, so we >> decided to move to an opensource control panel with a more >> active >> developement. We chose ISPConfig3, which uses MySQL as >> backend. We're >> quite happy with its performance and features which, since >> we're talking >> about a newer product, they clearly surpass ISPMan, and >> although MySQL >> is not as fast as ldap, I must admit we like it better >> (I've never been >> too passionate about ldap). >> >> Regards, >> >> Ignacio >> >> - -- >> Ignacio García >> ig...@oe... >> E.S. Oenus S.L >> Alfaro, 4 >> 46701-Gandia >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAks3G0MACgkQoYMx3fsuWura9gCguGvxFpJtAgp8YZ8nWB1dmLfk >> K+0An2gOf6WIybwCyhSo9cLfbwP0Wte4 >> =6j/s >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer >> Community >> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development >> support >> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app >> distribution fast and easy >> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon >> customers >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Ispman-users mailing list >> Isp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program > Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users > worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and > speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > |
|
From: Peter C. <pe...@ya...> - 2010-08-24 17:40:18
|
Hi All, Has anyone really found a better alternative to ispman that supports cyrus imap and is enterprise, etc? thank you, peter --- On Thu, 12/17/09, Atif Ghaffar <ati...@gm...> wrote: From: Atif Ghaffar <ati...@gm...> Subject: Re: [Ispman-users] State of ispman? To: isp...@li... Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009, 10:41 AM Hi Joerg, Hello All, I also started a php based version called isp-director but also havent finished because of lack of time from my job and kids. The only changes that must warrant a new release is rewrite with new code and a different layout but the features are already there that are needed. On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Joerg Delker <jd...@on...> wrote: Hi Yves, lets face the hard truth. Despite minor bug fixes there has been no further development for several months. That's mainly because ISPMan already does a good job where it fits and (at least for myself) lack of time for coding. While the overall architecture is nice, the code structure isn't, which may hold off people invest time and passion into this project. Looking at alternatives myself, I haven't found an adequate successor yet, that would follow similar architecture principles with a promising code base. Suggestions welcome! I already started a new project myself (java+webservice based) that picks up where ISPMan ended, but again due to lack of time this has not advanced far enough to make any suggestions here. ISPMan as we know it, is certainly a dead end, since no new version will be released anymore. I'm still committing bugfixes though, that come to my notice. For existing deployments this may be ok for some time, but I would not suggest any new installations (unless it fits your purpose perfectly and you are eager to get your hands dirty with perl). If anybody found other solutions, please feel free to post and discuss them here - it won't distract too much from the other ispman-user traffic ;) Cheers Jörg Yves Serrano wrote: > Hi there (if anybody still is subscribed to this list...) > > I use ispman since 2004 and I really like this tool! > It's time to move too new servers, is ispman still the weapon of choice? > > The user list is not that active, but a least there is a ispman release from this > year and not last year (but that will change soon...). > > Where are ispman users migrating to, or are you still using ispman for future setups? > Is there an ispman successor? Ispdirector doesn't seems very active. > I looked at ispconfig 3, but I still prefer a solution with a REAL directory server, like ispman with ldap! > >>From an architectural standpoint of view, I don't found anything better than ispman! > But it seems like a dead horse :-( > > So what are you doing? > > regards > Yves > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Return on Information: > Google Enterprise Search pays you back > Get the facts. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ispman-users mailing list Isp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users -- best regards Atif Ghaffar -----Inline Attachment Follows----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Ispman-users mailing list Isp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users |
|
From: Peter C. <pe...@ya...> - 2010-08-24 17:33:29
|
Hi, Is Ispconfig3 really better? 1. can it support cyrus Imap ? 2. Is it enterprise ? Please let me know. thank you, peter --- On Sun, 12/27/09, Ignacio Garcia <ig...@oe...> wrote: > From: Ignacio Garcia <ig...@oe...> > Subject: Re: [Ispman-users] State of ispman? > To: isp...@li... > Date: Sunday, December 27, 2009, 2:31 AM > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > El 17/12/09 18:05, ane...@gm... > escribió: > > Hi, > > > > i have checked some months ago different panels like > ispCP and > > ispConfig, but i really didn't find any better > application like > > architectures and organization of things inside like > ISPMan. > > We still use ISPMan on 2 of our most "senior" servers and > it works > great. However, for new servers we couldn't risk > implementing a solution > that is not being applied/tested against new versions of > services, so we > decided to move to an opensource control panel with a more > active > developement. We chose ISPConfig3, which uses MySQL as > backend. We're > quite happy with its performance and features which, since > we're talking > about a newer product, they clearly surpass ISPMan, and > although MySQL > is not as fast as ldap, I must admit we like it better > (I've never been > too passionate about ldap). > > Regards, > > Ignacio > > - -- > Ignacio García > ig...@oe... > E.S. Oenus S.L > Alfaro, 4 > 46701-Gandia > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAks3G0MACgkQoYMx3fsuWura9gCguGvxFpJtAgp8YZ8nWB1dmLfk > K+0An2gOf6WIybwCyhSo9cLfbwP0Wte4 > =6j/s > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer > Community > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development > support > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app > distribution fast and easy > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon > customers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > |
|
From: Ignacio G. <ig...@oe...> - 2009-12-27 08:51:00
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El 17/12/09 18:05, ane...@gm... escribió: > Hi, > > i have checked some months ago different panels like ispCP and > ispConfig, but i really didn't find any better application like > architectures and organization of things inside like ISPMan. We still use ISPMan on 2 of our most "senior" servers and it works great. However, for new servers we couldn't risk implementing a solution that is not being applied/tested against new versions of services, so we decided to move to an opensource control panel with a more active developement. We chose ISPConfig3, which uses MySQL as backend. We're quite happy with its performance and features which, since we're talking about a newer product, they clearly surpass ISPMan, and although MySQL is not as fast as ldap, I must admit we like it better (I've never been too passionate about ldap). Regards, Ignacio - -- Ignacio García ig...@oe... E.S. Oenus S.L Alfaro, 4 46701-Gandia -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAks3G0MACgkQoYMx3fsuWura9gCguGvxFpJtAgp8YZ8nWB1dmLfk K+0An2gOf6WIybwCyhSo9cLfbwP0Wte4 =6j/s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Atif G. <ati...@gm...> - 2009-12-19 02:45:21
|
If there is interest, I can revive the isp-director codebase to a state where it is as usuable as the ispman project. On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:05 PM, ane...@gm... <ane...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > i have checked some months ago different panels like ispCP and > ispConfig, but i really didn't find any better application like > architectures and organization of things inside like ISPMan. > > I remember that Atif Ghaffar was started isp-director project, but it > looks that it will not continue to be developed as Atif informed > already. > > We are still using ISPMan, but we are also looking for an good > alternative. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and > easy > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > -- best regards Atif Ghaffar |
|
From: <ane...@gm...> - 2009-12-17 17:05:57
|
Hi, i have checked some months ago different panels like ispCP and ispConfig, but i really didn't find any better application like architectures and organization of things inside like ISPMan. I remember that Atif Ghaffar was started isp-director project, but it looks that it will not continue to be developed as Atif informed already. We are still using ISPMan, but we are also looking for an good alternative. |
|
From: Atif G. <ati...@gm...> - 2009-12-17 16:41:36
|
Hi Joerg, Hello All, I also started a php based version called isp-director but also havent finished because of lack of time from my job and kids. The only changes that must warrant a new release is rewrite with new code and a different layout but the features are already there that are needed. On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Joerg Delker <jd...@on...> wrote: > Hi Yves, > > lets face the hard truth. > > Despite minor bug fixes there has been no further development for > several months. That's mainly because ISPMan already does a good job > where it fits and (at least for myself) lack of time for coding. > While the overall architecture is nice, the code structure isn't, which > may hold off people invest time and passion into this project. > > Looking at alternatives myself, I haven't found an adequate successor > yet, that would follow similar architecture principles with a promising > code base. Suggestions welcome! > I already started a new project myself (java+webservice based) that > picks up where ISPMan ended, but again due to lack of time this has not > advanced far enough to make any suggestions here. > > ISPMan as we know it, is certainly a dead end, since no new version will > be released anymore. I'm still committing bugfixes though, that come to > my notice. For existing deployments this may be ok for some time, but I > would not suggest any new installations (unless it fits your purpose > perfectly and you are eager to get your hands dirty with perl). > > If anybody found other solutions, please feel free to post and discuss > them here - it won't distract too much from the other ispman-user traffic > ;) > > Cheers > Jörg > > > Yves Serrano wrote: > > Hi there (if anybody still is subscribed to this list...) > > > > I use ispman since 2004 and I really like this tool! > > It's time to move too new servers, is ispman still the weapon of choice? > > > > The user list is not that active, but a least there is a ispman release > from this > > year and not last year (but that will change soon...). > > > > Where are ispman users migrating to, or are you still using ispman for > future setups? > > Is there an ispman successor? Ispdirector doesn't seems very active. > > I looked at ispconfig 3, but I still prefer a solution with a REAL > directory server, like ispman with ldap! > > > >>From an architectural standpoint of view, I don't found anything better > than ispman! > > But it seems like a dead horse :-( > > > > So what are you doing? > > > > regards > > Yves > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Return on Information: > > Google Enterprise Search pays you back > > Get the facts. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Ispman-users mailing list > > Isp...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and > easy > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > -- best regards Atif Ghaffar |
|
From: Joerg D. <jd...@on...> - 2009-12-16 16:48:24
|
Hi Yves, lets face the hard truth. Despite minor bug fixes there has been no further development for several months. That's mainly because ISPMan already does a good job where it fits and (at least for myself) lack of time for coding. While the overall architecture is nice, the code structure isn't, which may hold off people invest time and passion into this project. Looking at alternatives myself, I haven't found an adequate successor yet, that would follow similar architecture principles with a promising code base. Suggestions welcome! I already started a new project myself (java+webservice based) that picks up where ISPMan ended, but again due to lack of time this has not advanced far enough to make any suggestions here. ISPMan as we know it, is certainly a dead end, since no new version will be released anymore. I'm still committing bugfixes though, that come to my notice. For existing deployments this may be ok for some time, but I would not suggest any new installations (unless it fits your purpose perfectly and you are eager to get your hands dirty with perl). If anybody found other solutions, please feel free to post and discuss them here - it won't distract too much from the other ispman-user traffic ;) Cheers Jörg Yves Serrano wrote: > Hi there (if anybody still is subscribed to this list...) > > I use ispman since 2004 and I really like this tool! > It's time to move too new servers, is ispman still the weapon of choice? > > The user list is not that active, but a least there is a ispman release from this > year and not last year (but that will change soon...). > > Where are ispman users migrating to, or are you still using ispman for future setups? > Is there an ispman successor? Ispdirector doesn't seems very active. > I looked at ispconfig 3, but I still prefer a solution with a REAL directory server, like ispman with ldap! > >>From an architectural standpoint of view, I don't found anything better than ispman! > But it seems like a dead horse :-( > > So what are you doing? > > regards > Yves > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Return on Information: > Google Enterprise Search pays you back > Get the facts. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users |
|
From: Yves S. <y...@ya...> - 2009-12-16 10:19:53
|
I also found this http://www.virtualmin.com/documentation/id,combining_virtualmin_and_ldap/ does anybody use virtualmin with ldap? On 14.12.2009, at 18:42, Johannes Egger wrote: > ispman seems quite dead, and when I last looked at it, even at the latest > patchlevel, drilling down into the gui, a lot of small features seemed > broken ... > > I'm also looking at ispconfig 3. > Sure, a REAL directory server would be better - architecture-wise. But does > it really make a difference, if the functionality is there? Hmm there are a lot of products that have the option to plugin via ldap. For example when I want to authenticate django against users from my ldap directory there is a django-ldap product. Sure, I could make custom auth code to do this, but with ldap there is normally already something there where I can plug into. > Maybe it would be possible to write an ldap backend for ispconfig 3... > That'd definitely make more sense than stay with ispman ... Staying with ispman seems to really be a dead end :-( > Johannes Yves |
|
From: Yves S. <y...@ya...> - 2009-12-13 10:47:28
|
Hi there (if anybody still is subscribed to this list...) I use ispman since 2004 and I really like this tool! It's time to move too new servers, is ispman still the weapon of choice? The user list is not that active, but a least there is a ispman release from this year and not last year (but that will change soon...). Where are ispman users migrating to, or are you still using ispman for future setups? Is there an ispman successor? Ispdirector doesn't seems very active. I looked at ispconfig 3, but I still prefer a solution with a REAL directory server, like ispman with ldap! From an architectural standpoint of view, I don't found anything better than ispman! But it seems like a dead horse :-( So what are you doing? regards Yves |
|
From: Ali N. <ane...@gm...> - 2008-06-04 08:33:42
|
Hi, i have a problem with the script ispman.listOverQuotaMailboxes when i try to get all mailboxes with over quota. I get these errors: 1. Can't locate package AutoLoader for @ISPMan::Config::ISA at /var/www/ispman/bin/../lib/ISPMan/Config.pm line 90, <DATA> line 424. 2. Can't locate package AutoLoader for @ISPMan::Config::ISA at /var/www/ispman/bin/../lib/ISPMan/Config.pm line 90, <DATA> line 424. 3. Can't locate package AutoLoader for @ISPMan::Config::ISA at /var/www/ispman/bin/../lib/ISPMan/Config.pm line 90, <DATA> line 424. 4. Name "main::mailbox" used only once: possible typo at ./ispman.listOverQuotaMailboxes line 32, <DATA> line 424. 5. Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at /var/www/ispman/bin/../lib/mailbox_actions_cyrus.lib line 27, <DATA> line 424. 6. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /var/www/ispman/bin/../lib/mailbox_actions_cyrus.lib line 29, <DATA> line 424. 7. Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at /var/www/ispman/bin/../lib/mailbox_actions_cyrus.lib line 27, <DATA> line 424. 8. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /var/www/ispman/bin/../lib/mailbox_actions_cyrus.lib line 29, <DATA> line 424. 9. Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at /var/www/ispman/bin/../lib/mailbox_actions_cyrus.lib line 27, <DATA> line 424. What can i do to fix this problem ? Thanks in advanced! Regards, Ali Nebi! |
|
From: Pedro A. a. s. <uf...@uf...> - 2008-05-23 06:06:16
|
----- "Johannes Egger" <joh...@ti...> escreveu: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 9:47 am, Margusja wrote: > > 1.3 is very stable. I am using it when it went out. No problems. > > Which release is that? rc2? Or have you done a CVS update? > > I've read this mailinglist post in the archives: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=2101.62.194.18.7.1155155570.squirrel%40wmail.websystems.nl&forum_name=ispman-users > > ... where Pedro Algarvio states that the CCP is seriously broken and > unmaintained. Does it work > for you? Only the clients CCP, not the Admin CCP > > I've also noticed that you've tried the new CCP by Pedro. Just out of > curiosity, or is the old one > indeed broken? You can try it too(minimal in function): http://demo.ufsoft.org username: demo.ufsoft.org password: demo > > > Thanks for your reply, > Johannes > Best Regards, -- Pedro Algarvio __ ___ ___ _______ ___ __ | Y .' _| _ .-----.' _| |_ .-----.----.-----. |. | | _| 1___| _ | _| _|__| _ | _| _ | |. | |__| |____ |_____|__| |____|__|_____|__| |___ | |: 1 | |: 1 | |_____| |::.. . | |::.. . | ufs [AT] ufsoft [DOT] org `-------' `-------' ufs [AT] sapo [DOT] pt |
|
From: Ryan W. <ry...@th...> - 2008-05-22 09:26:14
|
cocks }-----Original Message----- }From: isp...@li... [mailto:ispman-users- }bo...@li...] On Behalf Of Margusja }Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 4:10 AM }To: isp...@li... }Subject: Re: [Ispman-users] Which version to use for production? } }Not really yet. It is under development process. E-mail handling panel }is ready and lots of people allready are using it. But I changed work so }lets see will I have time develop it. } }--- }Margusja }+3725148780 }skype: margusja }msn: mar...@ko... }homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee } } } }Johannes Egger wrote: }> You wrote your own? :-) }> Is it open source / publicly available? }> }> Johannes }> }> }> On Thu, May 22, 2008 10:49 am, Margusja wrote: }> }>> No. I have build new one :) }>> }>> --- }>> Margusja }>> +3725148780 }>> skype: margusja }>> msn: mar...@ko... }>> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee }>> }>> }>> }>> Johannes Egger wrote: }>> }>>> yes, but does the CCP work fine? }>>> }>>> }>>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 10:44 am, Margusja wrote: }>>> }>>> }>>>> rc2 and updated from csv I really don't remember was there }something new }>>>> in csv. }>>>> }>>>> --- }>>>> Margusja }>>>> +3725148780 }>>>> skype: margusja }>>>> msn: mar...@ko... }>>>> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee }>>>> }>>>> }>>>> }>>>> Johannes Egger wrote: }>>>> }>>>> }>>>>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 9:47 am, Margusja wrote: }>>>>> }>>>>> }>>>>> }>>>>>> 1.3 is very stable. I am using it when it went out. No problems. }>>>>>> }>>>>>> }>>>>>> }>>>>> Which release is that? rc2? Or have you done a CVS update? }>>>>> }>>>>> I've read this mailinglist post in the archives: }>>>>> }http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=2101.62.194.18. }7.1155155570.squirrel%40wmail.websystems.nl&forum_name=ispman-users }>>>>> }>>>>> ... where Pedro Algarvio states that the CCP is seriously broken }and unmaintained. Does it }>>>>> work }>>>>> for you? }>>>>> }>>>>> I've also noticed that you've tried the new CCP by Pedro. Just out }of curiosity, or is the old }>>>>> one }>>>>> indeed broken? }>>>>> }>>>>> }>>>>> Thanks for your reply, }>>>>> Johannes }>>>>> }>>>>> }>>>>> }>>>>> }>>>>> }>>>>>> --- }>>>>>> Margusja }>>>>>> +3725148780 }>>>>>> skype: margusja }>>>>>> msn: mar...@ko... }>>>>>> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee }>>>>>> }>>>>>> }>>>>>> }>>>>>> Johannes Egger wrote: }>>>>>> }>>>>>> }>>>>>> }>>>>>>> Hello all, }>>>>>>> }>>>>>>> I've been looking at ISPMan as a tool to manage several severs }using LDAP, to share the same }>>>>>>> authentication information as well as give users a means to set }up their own }>>>>>>> vhosts/dns/email }>>>>>>> etc }>>>>>>> using the CCP. }>>>>>>> }>>>>>>> I have seen that ISPMan 1.3 is still under development and have }been wondering what the last }>>>>>>> stable / production version is? Should I use ISPMan 1.2 out of }the box and do a "CVS update" }>>>>>>> (is }>>>>>>> that stable?), or should I just use the 1.2 release as it is? }I'm reluctant to try 1.3 }>>>>>>> because }>>>>>>> I }>>>>>>> need the CCP and have read in another thread that it is }currently broken. }>>>>>>> }>>>>>>> Thanks, }>>>>>>> Johannes }>>>>>>> }>>>>>>> }>>>>>>> }>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- }--------- }>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft }>>>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. }>>>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ }>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ }>>>>>>> Ispman-users mailing list }>>>>>>> Isp...@li... }>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users }>>>>>>> }>>>>>>> }>>>>>>> }>>>>>>> }>>>>>>> }>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- }-------- }>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft }>>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. }>>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ }>>>>>> _______________________________________________ }>>>>>> Ispman-users mailing list }>>>>>> Isp...@li... }>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users }>>>>>> }>>>>>> }>>>>>> }>>>>>> }>>>>>> }>>>>> }>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- }------ }>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft }>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. }>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ }>>>> _______________________________________________ }>>>> Ispman-users mailing list }>>>> Isp...@li... }>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users }>>>> }>>>> }>>>> }>>>> }>>> }>>> }>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- }---- }>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft }>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. }>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ }>> _______________________________________________ }>> Ispman-users mailing list }>> Isp...@li... }>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users }>> }>> }>> }> }> }> } }------------------------------------------------------------------------ }- }This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft }Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. }http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ }_______________________________________________ }Ispman-users mailing list }Isp...@li... }https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users } }No virus found in this incoming message. }Checked by AVG. }Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.21/1458 - Release Date: }5/21/2008 7:21 AM } No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.21/1458 - Release Date: 5/21/2008 7:21 AM |
|
From: Margusja <mar...@ko...> - 2008-05-22 09:10:18
|
Not really yet. It is under development process. E-mail handling panel is ready and lots of people allready are using it. But I changed work so lets see will I have time develop it. --- Margusja +3725148780 skype: margusja msn: mar...@ko... homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee Johannes Egger wrote: > You wrote your own? :-) > Is it open source / publicly available? > > Johannes > > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 10:49 am, Margusja wrote: > >> No. I have build new one :) >> >> --- >> Margusja >> +3725148780 >> skype: margusja >> msn: mar...@ko... >> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee >> >> >> >> Johannes Egger wrote: >> >>> yes, but does the CCP work fine? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 10:44 am, Margusja wrote: >>> >>> >>>> rc2 and updated from csv I really don't remember was there something new >>>> in csv. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Margusja >>>> +3725148780 >>>> skype: margusja >>>> msn: mar...@ko... >>>> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Johannes Egger wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 9:47 am, Margusja wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 1.3 is very stable. I am using it when it went out. No problems. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Which release is that? rc2? Or have you done a CVS update? >>>>> >>>>> I've read this mailinglist post in the archives: >>>>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=2101.62.194.18.7.1155155570.squirrel%40wmail.websystems.nl&forum_name=ispman-users >>>>> >>>>> ... where Pedro Algarvio states that the CCP is seriously broken and unmaintained. Does it >>>>> work >>>>> for you? >>>>> >>>>> I've also noticed that you've tried the new CCP by Pedro. Just out of curiosity, or is the old >>>>> one >>>>> indeed broken? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your reply, >>>>> Johannes >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Margusja >>>>>> +3725148780 >>>>>> skype: margusja >>>>>> msn: mar...@ko... >>>>>> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Johannes Egger wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've been looking at ISPMan as a tool to manage several severs using LDAP, to share the same >>>>>>> authentication information as well as give users a means to set up their own >>>>>>> vhosts/dns/email >>>>>>> etc >>>>>>> using the CCP. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have seen that ISPMan 1.3 is still under development and have been wondering what the last >>>>>>> stable / production version is? Should I use ISPMan 1.2 out of the box and do a "CVS update" >>>>>>> (is >>>>>>> that stable?), or should I just use the 1.2 release as it is? I'm reluctant to try 1.3 >>>>>>> because >>>>>>> I >>>>>>> need the CCP and have read in another thread that it is currently broken. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Johannes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Ispman-users mailing list >>>>>>> Isp...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Ispman-users mailing list >>>>>> Isp...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Ispman-users mailing list >>>> Isp...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Ispman-users mailing list >> Isp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >> >> >> > > > |
|
From: Johannes E. <joh...@ti...> - 2008-05-22 09:07:40
|
You wrote your own? :-) Is it open source / publicly available? Johannes On Thu, May 22, 2008 10:49 am, Margusja wrote: > No. I have build new one :) > > --- > Margusja > +3725148780 > skype: margusja > msn: mar...@ko... > homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee > > > > Johannes Egger wrote: >> yes, but does the CCP work fine? >> >> >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 10:44 am, Margusja wrote: >> >>> rc2 and updated from csv I really don't remember was there something new >>> in csv. >>> >>> --- >>> Margusja >>> +3725148780 >>> skype: margusja >>> msn: mar...@ko... >>> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee >>> >>> >>> >>> Johannes Egger wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 9:47 am, Margusja wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> 1.3 is very stable. I am using it when it went out. No problems. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Which release is that? rc2? Or have you done a CVS update? >>>> >>>> I've read this mailinglist post in the archives: >>>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=2101.62.194.18.7.1155155570.squirrel%40wmail.websystems.nl&forum_name=ispman-users >>>> >>>> ... where Pedro Algarvio states that the CCP is seriously broken and unmaintained. Does it >>>> work >>>> for you? >>>> >>>> I've also noticed that you've tried the new CCP by Pedro. Just out of curiosity, or is the old >>>> one >>>> indeed broken? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for your reply, >>>> Johannes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> Margusja >>>>> +3725148780 >>>>> skype: margusja >>>>> msn: mar...@ko... >>>>> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Johannes Egger wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've been looking at ISPMan as a tool to manage several severs using LDAP, to share the same >>>>>> authentication information as well as give users a means to set up their own >>>>>> vhosts/dns/email >>>>>> etc >>>>>> using the CCP. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have seen that ISPMan 1.3 is still under development and have been wondering what the last >>>>>> stable / production version is? Should I use ISPMan 1.2 out of the box and do a "CVS update" >>>>>> (is >>>>>> that stable?), or should I just use the 1.2 release as it is? I'm reluctant to try 1.3 >>>>>> because >>>>>> I >>>>>> need the CCP and have read in another thread that it is currently broken. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Johannes >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Ispman-users mailing list >>>>>> Isp...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Ispman-users mailing list >>>>> Isp...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ispman-users mailing list >>> Isp...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > > -- |
|
From: Margusja <mar...@ko...> - 2008-05-22 08:49:29
|
No. I have build new one :) --- Margusja +3725148780 skype: margusja msn: mar...@ko... homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee Johannes Egger wrote: > yes, but does the CCP work fine? > > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 10:44 am, Margusja wrote: > >> rc2 and updated from csv I really don't remember was there something new >> in csv. >> >> --- >> Margusja >> +3725148780 >> skype: margusja >> msn: mar...@ko... >> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee >> >> >> >> Johannes Egger wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 9:47 am, Margusja wrote: >>> >>> >>>> 1.3 is very stable. I am using it when it went out. No problems. >>>> >>>> >>> Which release is that? rc2? Or have you done a CVS update? >>> >>> I've read this mailinglist post in the archives: >>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=2101.62.194.18.7.1155155570.squirrel%40wmail.websystems.nl&forum_name=ispman-users >>> >>> ... where Pedro Algarvio states that the CCP is seriously broken and unmaintained. Does it work >>> for you? >>> >>> I've also noticed that you've tried the new CCP by Pedro. Just out of curiosity, or is the old >>> one >>> indeed broken? >>> >>> >>> Thanks for your reply, >>> Johannes >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> --- >>>> Margusja >>>> +3725148780 >>>> skype: margusja >>>> msn: mar...@ko... >>>> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Johannes Egger wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> I've been looking at ISPMan as a tool to manage several severs using LDAP, to share the same >>>>> authentication information as well as give users a means to set up their own vhosts/dns/email >>>>> etc >>>>> using the CCP. >>>>> >>>>> I have seen that ISPMan 1.3 is still under development and have been wondering what the last >>>>> stable / production version is? Should I use ISPMan 1.2 out of the box and do a "CVS update" >>>>> (is >>>>> that stable?), or should I just use the 1.2 release as it is? I'm reluctant to try 1.3 because >>>>> I >>>>> need the CCP and have read in another thread that it is currently broken. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Johannes >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Ispman-users mailing list >>>>> Isp...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Ispman-users mailing list >>>> Isp...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Ispman-users mailing list >> Isp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >> >> >> > > > |
|
From: Johannes E. <joh...@ti...> - 2008-05-22 08:48:10
|
yes, but does the CCP work fine? On Thu, May 22, 2008 10:44 am, Margusja wrote: > rc2 and updated from csv I really don't remember was there something new > in csv. > > --- > Margusja > +3725148780 > skype: margusja > msn: mar...@ko... > homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee > > > > Johannes Egger wrote: >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 9:47 am, Margusja wrote: >> >>> 1.3 is very stable. I am using it when it went out. No problems. >>> >> >> Which release is that? rc2? Or have you done a CVS update? >> >> I've read this mailinglist post in the archives: >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=2101.62.194.18.7.1155155570.squirrel%40wmail.websystems.nl&forum_name=ispman-users >> >> ... where Pedro Algarvio states that the CCP is seriously broken and unmaintained. Does it work >> for you? >> >> I've also noticed that you've tried the new CCP by Pedro. Just out of curiosity, or is the old >> one >> indeed broken? >> >> >> Thanks for your reply, >> Johannes >> >> >> >>> --- >>> Margusja >>> +3725148780 >>> skype: margusja >>> msn: mar...@ko... >>> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee >>> >>> >>> >>> Johannes Egger wrote: >>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> I've been looking at ISPMan as a tool to manage several severs using LDAP, to share the same >>>> authentication information as well as give users a means to set up their own vhosts/dns/email >>>> etc >>>> using the CCP. >>>> >>>> I have seen that ISPMan 1.3 is still under development and have been wondering what the last >>>> stable / production version is? Should I use ISPMan 1.2 out of the box and do a "CVS update" >>>> (is >>>> that stable?), or should I just use the 1.2 release as it is? I'm reluctant to try 1.3 because >>>> I >>>> need the CCP and have read in another thread that it is currently broken. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Johannes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Ispman-users mailing list >>>> Isp...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ispman-users mailing list >>> Isp...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > > -- |
|
From: Margusja <mar...@ko...> - 2008-05-22 08:44:40
|
rc2 and updated from csv I really don't remember was there something new in csv. --- Margusja +3725148780 skype: margusja msn: mar...@ko... homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee Johannes Egger wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 9:47 am, Margusja wrote: > >> 1.3 is very stable. I am using it when it went out. No problems. >> > > Which release is that? rc2? Or have you done a CVS update? > > I've read this mailinglist post in the archives: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=2101.62.194.18.7.1155155570.squirrel%40wmail.websystems.nl&forum_name=ispman-users > > ... where Pedro Algarvio states that the CCP is seriously broken and unmaintained. Does it work > for you? > > I've also noticed that you've tried the new CCP by Pedro. Just out of curiosity, or is the old one > indeed broken? > > > Thanks for your reply, > Johannes > > > >> --- >> Margusja >> +3725148780 >> skype: margusja >> msn: mar...@ko... >> homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee >> >> >> >> Johannes Egger wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I've been looking at ISPMan as a tool to manage several severs using LDAP, to share the same >>> authentication information as well as give users a means to set up their own vhosts/dns/email >>> etc >>> using the CCP. >>> >>> I have seen that ISPMan 1.3 is still under development and have been wondering what the last >>> stable / production version is? Should I use ISPMan 1.2 out of the box and do a "CVS update" (is >>> that stable?), or should I just use the 1.2 release as it is? I'm reluctant to try 1.3 because I >>> need the CCP and have read in another thread that it is currently broken. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Johannes >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ispman-users mailing list >>> Isp...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Ispman-users mailing list >> Isp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >> >> >> > > > |
|
From: Johannes E. <joh...@ti...> - 2008-05-22 08:24:23
|
On Thu, May 22, 2008 9:47 am, Margusja wrote: > 1.3 is very stable. I am using it when it went out. No problems. Which release is that? rc2? Or have you done a CVS update? I've read this mailinglist post in the archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=2101.62.194.18.7.1155155570.squirrel%40wmail.websystems.nl&forum_name=ispman-users ... where Pedro Algarvio states that the CCP is seriously broken and unmaintained. Does it work for you? I've also noticed that you've tried the new CCP by Pedro. Just out of curiosity, or is the old one indeed broken? Thanks for your reply, Johannes > > --- > Margusja > +3725148780 > skype: margusja > msn: mar...@ko... > homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee > > > > Johannes Egger wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I've been looking at ISPMan as a tool to manage several severs using LDAP, to share the same >> authentication information as well as give users a means to set up their own vhosts/dns/email >> etc >> using the CCP. >> >> I have seen that ISPMan 1.3 is still under development and have been wondering what the last >> stable / production version is? Should I use ISPMan 1.2 out of the box and do a "CVS update" (is >> that stable?), or should I just use the 1.2 release as it is? I'm reluctant to try 1.3 because I >> need the CCP and have read in another thread that it is currently broken. >> >> Thanks, >> Johannes >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Ispman-users mailing list >> Isp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > > -- |
|
From: Margusja <mar...@ko...> - 2008-05-22 07:47:37
|
1.3 is very stable. I am using it when it went out. No problems. --- Margusja +3725148780 skype: margusja msn: mar...@ko... homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee Johannes Egger wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been looking at ISPMan as a tool to manage several severs using LDAP, to share the same > authentication information as well as give users a means to set up their own vhosts/dns/email etc > using the CCP. > > I have seen that ISPMan 1.3 is still under development and have been wondering what the last > stable / production version is? Should I use ISPMan 1.2 out of the box and do a "CVS update" (is > that stable?), or should I just use the 1.2 release as it is? I'm reluctant to try 1.3 because I > need the CCP and have read in another thread that it is currently broken. > > Thanks, > Johannes > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-users mailing list > Isp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users > > |
|
From: Johannes E. <joh...@ti...> - 2008-05-22 07:45:32
|
Hello all, I've been looking at ISPMan as a tool to manage several severs using LDAP, to share the same authentication information as well as give users a means to set up their own vhosts/dns/email etc using the CCP. I have seen that ISPMan 1.3 is still under development and have been wondering what the last stable / production version is? Should I use ISPMan 1.2 out of the box and do a "CVS update" (is that stable?), or should I just use the 1.2 release as it is? I'm reluctant to try 1.3 because I need the CCP and have read in another thread that it is currently broken. Thanks, Johannes |
71 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
