we need to review the fields where we have 'add multiple values': is this done to fullfill the isa-tab spec, and how/if the validator/parser cope with these multiple values.
Address case sensitiveness of ISAtools: we need to be case insensitive, where possible. Currently the ISAvalidator is case sensitive and flags error that are not real on, but just issue with lower/upper case.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Will review this. However it's not a short job. What we still have as case-sensitive are many reference checkings, eg: the protocol in Protocol REF is case sensitive. Changing this requires a long review of many java files, both in the import layer and in the model.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Address case sensitiveness of ISAtools: we need to be case insensitive, where possible. Currently the ISAvalidator is case sensitive and flags error that are not real on, but just issue with lower/upper case.
Address case sensitiveness of ISAtools: we need to be case insensitive, where possible
Will review this. However it's not a short job. What we still have as case-sensitive are many reference checkings, eg: the protocol in Protocol REF is case sensitive. Changing this requires a long review of many java files, both in the import layer and in the model.