From: Duft M. <Mar...@sa...> - 2006-10-18 09:12:10
|
It made it through ;o) Nice to see that some work is done. I currently really have no time = (sorry) to take a deeper look at it. The optimizations are applied to = wgcc? What happens when you don't optimize, or optimize less? Does wggc = work then? Does wgcc convert paths from unix to windows correctly in = this kind of mixed build? I don't know if tha static_cast is a really good idea, this may cause = some difficult to find issues. But for now... ;o) the include should be = ok in any case ... The cool thing is, that both gcc and cl.exe builds of wgcc work for me = (i didn't try with cc) so this must be something with optimization or = static_cast... I wouldn't just take __RTDynamicCast from windows libc, = this would be really dangerous, if one could get it to work somehow. Cheers, Markus=20 -----Original Message----- From: int...@li... = [mailto:int...@li...] On Behalf = Of Jerker B=E4ck Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:32 AM To: int...@li... Subject: [wgcc-dev] Some bugs in wgcc when compiling with the MS = compiler Hello all, I have been testing a MS compiler build of wgcc Only a posix build for = Interix 5.2 (SUA) have been tested - no WIN32 or SFU builds. All changes to source code and "full" specification of tools used are mentioned. Compile and link are straightforward but execution of the binary = produced is still failing.=20 This is my first findings - I attach the bug report to this post. Hope it will make it trough the mail system. Regards Jerker B=E4ck=20 |