#212 do we need NC-IUBMB/ENZYME view?

[Kirill Degtyarenko]

I have a feeling that we discussed this already but I
can't recall what was the outcome.
Why do we even have "NC-IUBMB/ENZYME" only view?
IntEnz is supposed to be both, and maybe more.

For instance, I notice that EC 2.7.11.1 contains synonyms

phosphorylase B kinase kinase
glycogen synthase A kinase

which are marked for NC-IUBMB/ENZYME views but not for
IntEnz. This does not make any sense (I suspect this is
an error).

Kirill

[Kristian Axelsen]

Logged In: YES
user_id=919184

Hi,

No we don't need that view. When we discussed it we ccame to
the conclusion that we would never use the NC-IUBMB/ENZYME
combination. Either they are alone or combined with IntEnz,
IntEnz is never excluded.

/Kristian

[Rafael Alcántara]

So now we don't have IUBMB view, and the possible combinations are:
* IntEnz
* ENZYME
* IntEnz_ENZYME
However, there are still many objects in the database with IUBMB_* view. They will be converted as follows:
* IUBMB_IntEnz -> IntEnz
* IUBMB_ENZYME -> ENZYME
There are only three plain text reactions with just IUBMB view, for these EC numbers:
2.7.11.3
2.7.1.156
1.2.3.8
Please take a look and remove them if you confirm they are obsolete.

[Kristian Axelsen]

Hi Rafael,

I have now removed the 3 reactions in question.

Regards,

Kristian

[Rafael Alcántara]

Ticket moved from /p/intenz/feature-requests/10/

[Rafael Alcántara]

I have applied the fix to the database. Now I have to modify the curator tool to remove the IUBMB-related views.

[Rafael Alcántara]

I have rolled back the change in the database, as it brought havoc.
The INTENZ view has a misleading name, as any item with this is shown not only in the INTENZ view, but in all views.