Re: [Installbase-devel] Re: Small installbase problem...

[Georgios P. <pe...@ii...>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Damon Courtney" <da...@yo...>
To: <ins...@li...>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Installbase-devel] Re: Small installbase problem...


> > Well, having a tree of unlimited depth will be the best solution.
However,
> > I think that it would be quite complex to implement and I real
situations
> > nobody
> > will need more that two levels. But I think that adding at least one
level
> > is necessary. For example in my setup I have 5 groups. From them,
modules
> > and tools contain about 10 items each. It wouldn't be nice
> > to present the user 25 checkbuttons to select, where most users
> > will install all tools and modules and only those who have modified them
> > wouldn't install them, as to preserve their work. Of course such
> > an addition is not top priority :-)
>
>     This is now done and committed.  If you wanna' check it out, you'll
> have to restore the original theme to get the changes.  I basically added
> a check option to the Custom Setup pane to allow displaying file groups
> under components in a tree.
>

I downloaded it, but I wasn't able to test it.
I have updated the original theme (by coping the tcl
files in the lib directory) but now the install does not build at all.
It just gets stack when building the archieve, without getting
any cpu though. I can see that the *-main.zip is build, but the
final install is not.

I have tried to create a new install to test the new features,
which is built fine. However, it doesn't work, as a command
is missing from the freewrap executable (exactly the
same command you used to not include the blank.zip,
as stated in the changelog. I can't recall the actuall
name of the command though :-))

All these happen under linux (RH 8.0). But as you are going
to install linux also, I will wait untill you test it there :-)
It seems that a more recent freewrap binary is required
for linux. Regarding the build that is never completed I really
don't know what is wrong, as I get no error...

Thanks,

George