From: Michael H. C. <mi...@li...> - 2005-04-18 14:56:53
|
ho...@mi... wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Michael H. Collins wrote: > >> Dunno but I have been comparing infobot and flooterbuck and have begun >> using flooterbuck almost exclusivly > > > Michael - can you briefly explain why? What's it got that infobot > hasn't? Does it preserve all infobot's functionality? It certainly > looks a bit more active, but latest release is still over a year > ago... Yes. I am frustrated with devel on all the infobots. Not being a coder about all I can do is run em and report bugs. Flooterbuck has a few modules thrown in that infobot does not come with unless I am missing something. my best one is running on irc.taphouse.org #subgenius and his name is bobot -- Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguinista Navy http://linuxlink.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ / No HTML/RTF in email x No Word docs in email / \ Respect for open standards In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss. |