[Infiniband-general] RE: [openib-general] SVN vs. Bitkeeper (was: MT_bufpool_destroy?)

[Woodruff, R. J <wo...@co...>]

>I personally would like to see IBAL stay in BK, since that's what I've
been using. =20
>However, I suspect that you will eventually need to move to SVN or
support both - people=20
>will start to create patches against the SVN version, and you would
have to propagate=20
>these patches back to the BK repository.  I don't know how hard it is
to move data between=20
>BK and SVN.

>I don't have the bandwidth to switch to SVN at this point, and BK is
working wonderfully=20
> for me.

> - Fab

I was thinking for now we could leave the working data base in BK and=20
put snapshots into openib.org, at least for now. I'd hate to make
all the people that are sending in patches for IBAL have to switch
right now.=20
I guess we will just have to manually merge the SVN patches back into
BK. If the the volume of SVN patches gets greater than the BK patches,
we can revisit this.=20