From: Christian P. <bu...@de...> - 2009-04-06 06:34:15
|
Quoting Guntupalli Karunakar (kar...@in...): > Since its pretty much like status quo wont change on above two, we > could best leave it at that. After a few days thinking to this, I think I can hereby mention that I don't entirely agree with Karunakar, here. This with all respect I owe him for his work and commitment. >From what I understand of the Indlinux group goals, the values of Fee Software are a great priority for the group members. It means that we should be committed to have softwrae that's as free as possible. In the case of these fonts, it is clear that some improvement is possible. At least, the "spirit" of the original license and what I understand from the authors' goals does not seem incompatible with possible improvement. So, I'd like to know who we should get in touch with to discuss about the license conditions and a possible way to have the missing bits added so that the font may be considered free. Of course, that will need to be very respectful of the initial work and to avoid what could appear as "bashing" the current license wordig (in short, not appear as a professor teachin a pupil what a license should be). I think I can do that (well, I'm sometimes slightly arrogant in some ways: I'm not French by error....but I can manage to slow this down). This is by doing exactly this that we finally were able to include Sun's Java to Debian, for instance..:-) So, what we did for Java can probably be done for the AksharYogini font. |