From: शिरीष <sh...@gu...> - 2009-04-03 12:05:10
|
2009/4/3 Rahul Bhalerao <rah...@ya...>: > To summarize, the 'freedom to modify' issue is not yet answered. > It is not a big deal to put a name of a already well defined foss license of your choice additional to your own terms, given you wish to make it Free and Open Source. > But it is a big deal to not ensure freedoms for a product that potentially needs to be accepted as free. > > If you wish to change the statement in the font files and have any technical problem, I guess many people here, including me, would be more than happy to help out. > this "freedom to modify" is a tricky combination of words... in other words it means i would let you be the king in my place, legally speaking :-) it is just as dangerous as POA (power of attorney) not plan of action! in current scenario i think unless issued by the release by original holders that is a unwarranted freedom, and anyone can and may disagree... with this... |