From: K. K. S. <su...@gm...> - 2009-04-02 03:41:15
|
On Thursday 02 Apr 2009 12:07:03 am Guntupalli Karunakar wrote: > Gist of some earlier discussions with designer was that the font is > to be treated as work of art, so like in a painting, it be credited > to the painter, while replicas (copies) could be made, font design is > not to be modified. Bugs in font could be reported back to designer > for fixing This sounds like the license used by TeX and METAFONT (www.tux.org). I can understand the author's sentiments about not allowing any modifications under the AksharYogini name. Would the author allow modifications if the changes are released under a different name with an attribution to the source of inspiration? Surely, the intent of the author to perpetuate the memory would be better served if the font is allowed to evolve over the years? Subbu |