From: Guntupalli K. <kar...@in...> - 2009-04-01 18:45:34
|
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:16:16 +0200 Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Rahul Bhalerao (rah...@ya...): > > > Where are the 4 freedoms that Free Software ensures explicitly > > stated? Especially, freedom to modify and/or fork are not present > > at all. > > > Yes. This is precisely what was pointed in debian-legal in answer to > my request there. > > The license is not bad per se and, probably, the author's intent is > to make it really free....but the wording is not in line with > this. This is what often happens when people try to invent their own > licenses while there are dozens of these floating around that have > received enough attention and care to fit everybody's needs.... > > As of now, I would retain the lack of mention for "freedom for > modify" as the major blocker for that font set to be considered > Free. > Gist of some earlier discussions with designer was that the font is to be treated as work of art, so like in a painting, it be credited to the painter, while replicas (copies) could be made, font design is not to be modified. Bugs in font could be reported back to designer for fixing. Karunakar -- ********************************** * कार्य: http://www.indlinux.org * * चिठ्ठा: http://cartoonsoft.com/blog * ********************************** |