You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(110) |
Mar
(138) |
Apr
(29) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(110) |
Jul
(72) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(12) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(39) |
2005 |
Jan
(54) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Ryo C. <ry...@il...> - 2004-12-31 11:54:13
|
You might not see it if the language you're using hasn't been updated to include the new sort fields. If you switch to the language to English, under "List View Options" in the Options page, you should see "Sort by:" with the options: Time Sent, Time Received, Subject Size Ryo On 12/31/2004, "vlys" <vl...@ra...> wrote: >I can't find anything about sorting in the Options ... :-/ ??? Only >sorting by date, subject... > >Is it in the options od the webmail or in config files ?? > >Ryo Chijiiwa a écrit : > >>If you're using 0.9, go to Options and check if you're sorting by >>"Date Received" or "Date Sent". If you use "Date Received" the >>timestamp assigned by your mail server is used (which isn't stored in >>the message header), where as for "Date Sent", the date in the message >>header is used (if non is present, it becomes interpreted as >>timestamp=0, or the UNIX epoch). >> >>Ryo >> >>2004å¹´12æ?31æ¥ä»ãã®"Jim Munro" <jv...@ho...>ã®ã¡ã¼ã«ã«ããã¨?? >> >> >> >>>Ilohamail seems to have trouble with the time stamp in this header >>>Return-Path: <> >>>Delivered-To: xx...@xx... >>>Received: from /spool/local >>> by xxxx.xxxxxx.net with [XMail 1.20 LMAIL Server] >>> for <xx...@xx...> from <>; >>> Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:01:01 -0500 >>>to: <pos...@xx...> >>>from: <xmail@localhost> >>>subject: XMail Stats >>> >>>Ilohmail thinks the date is Dec 31 1969 >>>Oulook Express pulls the correct date. >>>I have noticed that my isp's webmail client and Ilohamail differ on message >>>dates >>>(usually only by a few seconds). >>>I think each are reading the message date from a different place in the >>>header. >>> >>>Cheers! >>> >>>_________________________________________________________________ >>>Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft?® >>>SmartScreen Technology. >>>http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines >>> Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN?® Premium right now and get the >>>first two months FREE*. >>> >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >>>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >>>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Ilohamail-testers mailing list >>>Ilo...@li... >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >>_______________________________________________ >>Ilohamail-testers mailing list >>Ilo...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers >> >>. >> >> >> > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >_______________________________________________ >Ilohamail-testers mailing list >Ilo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers |
From: vlys <vl...@ra...> - 2004-12-31 11:07:14
|
I can't find anything about sorting in the Options ... :-/ ??? Only=20 sorting by date, subject... Is it in the options od the webmail or in config files ?? Ryo Chijiiwa a =C3=A9crit : >If you're using 0.9, go to Options and check if you're sorting by >"Date Received" or "Date Sent". If you use "Date Received" the >timestamp assigned by your mail server is used (which isn't stored in >the message header), where as for "Date Sent", the date in the message >header is used (if non is present, it becomes interpreted as >timestamp=3D0, or the UNIX epoch). > >Ryo > >2004=E5=B9=B412=E6=9C=8831=E6=97=A5=E4=BB=98=E3=81=91=E3=81=AE"Jim Munro= " <jv...@ho...>=E3=81=AE=E3=83=A1=E3=83=BC=E3=83=AB=E3=81=AB=E3=82= =88=E3=82=8B=E3=81=A8=EF=BC=9A > > =20 > >>Ilohamail seems to have trouble with the time stamp in this header >>Return-Path: <> >>Delivered-To: xx...@xx... >>Received: from /spool/local >> by xxxx.xxxxxx.net with [XMail 1.20 LMAIL Server] >> for <xx...@xx...> from <>; >> Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:01:01 -0500 >>to: <pos...@xx...> >>from: <xmail@localhost> >>subject: XMail Stats >> >>Ilohmail thinks the date is Dec 31 1969 >>Oulook Express pulls the correct date. >>I have noticed that my isp's webmail client and Ilohamail differ on mes= sage >>dates >>(usually only by a few seconds). >>I think each are reading the message date from a different place in the >>header. >> >>Cheers! >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Micros= oft=EF=BD=AE >>SmartScreen Technology. >>http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=3Den-ca&page=3Dbyoa/prem&xAPID=3D1994&DI=3D= 1034&SU=3Dhttp://hotmail.com/enca&HL=3DMarket_MSNIS_Taglines >> Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN=EF=BD=AE Premium right now and = get the >>first two months FREE*. >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >>_______________________________________________ >>Ilohamail-testers mailing list >>Ilo...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers >> =20 >> > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >_______________________________________________ >Ilohamail-testers mailing list >Ilo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers > >. > > =20 > |
From: Ryo C. <ry...@il...> - 2004-12-31 11:05:32
|
I've been sending out individual messages about some of the changes in the latest version, but here they are in one lump. Since this is probably the last update for 2004, I would like to thank you all for your participation and support in IlohaMail. It's been a great year, and I look forward to working with you all in the new year. Have a happy and safe New Year! Ryo +Added ability to "cruise" through message while performing actions like delete, mark read/unread, and move. A new setting in Options lets you choose whether to return to the message list, go to the next message, or go to the previous message, after performing actions in the "read message" screen. [0.9 branch] +The "Unread" tool in the message view screen now switches to "Read" when viewing an unread message and "don't flag while traversing" option is enabled [0.9 branch] +Added "bcc self". The default can be set in the Options page, and can also be toggled in the compose window using a new checkbox located next to the "From" field. [0.9 branch] +Superficial change to thread toggler in message listing. Changed color, added plus sign, and moved to head of subject [0.9 branch] +Fixed bug where some contacts were inaccessible [0.9 branch] +Localizable filter prefs (for real this time, thanks to Rodolfo) [0.9 branch] +Improved IMAP cache consistency checks and error recovery [0.9 branch] +Improved threading consistency checks, reliability, and error recovery [0.9 branch] +Added memory usage display to stopwatch dump. Requires PHP to be built with --enable-memory-limit, but will auto-detect the presence of the required function. [0.9 branch] +Improved input sanitation and filtering [0.9 branch] +Updated CN translations (thanks to Donghui) [0.9 branch] +Updated Japanese translations [0.9 branch] |
From: Ryo C. <ry...@il...> - 2004-12-31 08:32:22
|
Can you get me more information about the JavaScript error? Ryo On 12/30/2004, "Tom Conway" <tc...@te...> wrote: > >Found this works wiith Javascript set to "High". If set to "Low" I >get an "Object / Method not supported" javascript error in main.php > > +Email addresses in message listing no longer shows [+] for addresses > that are in contacts [0.9 branch] > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >_______________________________________________ >Ilohamail-testers mailing list >Ilo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers |
From: Ryo C. <ry...@il...> - 2004-12-31 05:14:00
|
If you're using 0.9, go to Options and check if you're sorting by "Date Received" or "Date Sent". If you use "Date Received" the timestamp assigned by your mail server is used (which isn't stored in the message header), where as for "Date Sent", the date in the message header is used (if non is present, it becomes interpreted as timestamp=0, or the UNIX epoch). Ryo 2004$BG/(B12$B7n(B31$BF|IU$1$N(B"Jim Munro" <jv...@ho...>$B$N%a!<%k$K$h$k$H!'(B >Ilohamail seems to have trouble with the time stamp in this header >Return-Path: <> >Delivered-To: xx...@xx... >Received: from /spool/local > by xxxx.xxxxxx.net with [XMail 1.20 LMAIL Server] > for <xx...@xx...> from <>; > Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:01:01 -0500 >to: <pos...@xx...> >from: <xmail@localhost> >subject: XMail Stats > >Ilohmail thinks the date is Dec 31 1969 >Oulook Express pulls the correct date. >I have noticed that my isp's webmail client and Ilohamail differ on message >dates >(usually only by a few seconds). >I think each are reading the message date from a different place in the >header. > >Cheers! > >_________________________________________________________________ >Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft(I.(B >SmartScreen Technology. >http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines > Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN(I.(B Premium right now and get the >first two months FREE*. > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >_______________________________________________ >Ilohamail-testers mailing list >Ilo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers |
From: Jim M. <jv...@ho...> - 2004-12-31 04:34:01
|
Ilohamail seems to have trouble with the time stamp in this header Return-Path: <> Delivered-To: xx...@xx... Received: from /spool/local by xxxx.xxxxxx.net with [XMail 1.20 LMAIL Server] for <xx...@xx...> from <>; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:01:01 -0500 to: <pos...@xx...> from: <xmail@localhost> subject: XMail Stats Ilohmail thinks the date is Dec 31 1969 Oulook Express pulls the correct date. I have noticed that my isp's webmail client and Ilohamail differ on message dates (usually only by a few seconds). I think each are reading the message date from a different place in the header. Cheers! _________________________________________________________________ Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen Technology. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*. |
From: Eric D. <ed...@pi...> - 2004-12-31 00:23:15
|
Ah, the newest nightly is fixed, I see. I patched the stable pop3.inc, and it works now, so I don't need the file after all. Thanks. Eric Drechsel On 12/30/2004, " " <ed...@pi...> wrote: >We seem to be having the same problem. This problem exists in CVS >snapshot 20041224 as well. I'll try a newer snapshot after lunch. > >Anyway, I can't get the updated pop3.inc from the SF archives (it's >truncated). Would somebody send me a copy or put it online? > >Eric Drechsel >Pioneer-Net.com > >On 12/30/2004, "Jim Munro" <jv...@ho...> wrote: > >>Thanks for the great fix Ryo! :) >> >>It also tested ok in the nightly 20041229. >> >>Can pop3.inc be made more available for everyone who need it? >> >>Thanks again! |
From: <ed...@pi...> - 2004-12-30 22:23:43
|
We seem to be having the same problem. This problem exists in CVS snapshot 20041224 as well. I'll try a newer snapshot after lunch. Anyway, I can't get the updated pop3.inc from the SF archives (it's truncated). Would somebody send me a copy or put it online? Eric Drechsel Pioneer-Net.com On 12/30/2004, "Jim Munro" <jv...@ho...> wrote: >Thanks for the great fix Ryo! :) > >It also tested ok in the nightly 20041229. > >Can pop3.inc be made more available for everyone who need it? > >Thanks again! > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > >Designer Mail isn't just fun to send, it's fun to receive. Use special > >stationery, fonts and colors. > >http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=3Den-ca&page=3Dbyoa/prem&xAPID=3D1994&DI=3D103= 4&SU=3Dhttp://hotmail.com/enca&HL=3DMarket_MSNIS_Taglines > > Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN=AE Premium right now and get the > >first two months FREE*. > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > >_______________________________________________ > >Ilohamail-testers mailing list > >Ilo...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers > > |
From: Josh S. <jl...@jl...> - 2004-12-30 22:20:51
|
Josh Simpson wrote: > Hi there, > > love ilohamail, but may have found a bug :( > > When browsing subfolders on the left hand pain the higher ones disapre > when the lower ones are expanded. > > Screenshots are here > before expanding > http://jls.geek.nz/upload/1.bmp > > after expanding > http://jls.geek.nz/upload/2.bmp > > actual structure > http://jls.geek.nz/upload/real.bmp > > > So is this a bug, im currently using * *Version CVS-20041107-Devel Just upgraded to Version CVS-20041229-Devel and still has the same problem, javascript is currently set to "high" and using courier as the imap server* * > > Cheers > Josh > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Ilohamail-testers mailing list > Ilo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers > > |
From: Ryo C. <ry...@il...> - 2004-12-30 20:28:47
|
It's a bug. The fix will be in the next snapshot. Ryo On 12/30/2004, "Tom Conway" <tc...@te...> wrote: > >When I access a global contact which I am not the owner I get the message >"Could not access specified entry". Since it's global I would think I >could view-only the contacts other info, esp. phone numbers. > >This appears to be the logic for global calendar events. They're >accessable but the edit/update buttons are not visible. > >-Tom > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >_______________________________________________ >Ilohamail-testers mailing list >Ilo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers |
From: Tom C. <tc...@te...> - 2004-12-30 19:33:16
|
Found this works wiith Javascript set to "High". If set to "Low" I get an "Object / Method not supported" javascript error in main.php +Email addresses in message listing no longer shows [+] for addresses that are in contacts [0.9 branch] |
From: Jim M. <jv...@ho...> - 2004-12-30 16:08:07
|
Thanks for the great fix Ryo! :) It also tested ok in the nightly 20041229. Can pop3.inc be made more available for everyone who need it? Thanks again! _________________________________________________________________ Designer Mail isn't just fun to send, it's fun to receive. Use special stationery, fonts and colors. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*. |
From: Tom C. <tc...@te...> - 2004-12-30 14:28:02
|
When I access a global contact which I am not the owner I get the message "Could not access specified entry". Since it's global I would think I could view-only the contacts other info, esp. phone numbers. This appears to be the logic for global calendar events. They're accessable but the edit/update buttons are not visible. -Tom |
From: Josh S. <jl...@jl...> - 2004-12-30 01:13:17
|
Hi there, love ilohamail, but may have found a bug :( When browsing subfolders on the left hand pain the higher ones disapre when the lower ones are expanded. Screenshots are here before expanding http://jls.geek.nz/upload/1.bmp after expanding http://jls.geek.nz/upload/2.bmp actual structure http://jls.geek.nz/upload/real.bmp So is this a bug, im currently using * *Version CVS-20041107-Devel Cheers Josh |
From: Tom C. <tc...@te...> - 2004-12-29 15:58:52
|
This doesn't appear to work using the latest snapshot. +Email addresses in message listing no longer shows [+] for addresses that are in contacts [0.9 branch] Also I noted when I was writing this there was no "Save to Draft" option which I thought was there in earlier versions or is that my imagination? |
From: Ryo C. <ry...@il...> - 2004-12-29 06:18:17
|
Here are the changes: +Improved support for right-to-left languages, using dir="rtl". RTL languages are specified using $lang_rtl in include/lang.inc [0.9 branch] +Added HTML filter for error output from mail server in POP3 and IMAP libs [0.9 branch] +Added imap::iil_C_FetchUIDs which uses cache for better performance [0.9 branch] +Email addresses in message listing no longer shows [+] for addresses that are in contacts [0.9 branch] +Potential fix for message listing JavaScript error [0.9 branch] +Moving threaded messages from read_message window, will now move the entire thread (behavior not locked) [0.9 branch] +Filters screen is now localizable (thanks to Rodolfo Pilaz) [0.9 branch] +Some updates to Japanese translations [0.9 branch] +Fixed bug in compose2.php where, when opened by clicking on an identity in pref_identities, correct identity was not pre-selected [0.9 branch] Ryo |
From: Ryo C. <ry...@il...> - 2004-12-29 06:11:32
|
The demo site is running a more current version than RC1. Try replacing include/pop3.inc with the one attached to this message. Ryo On 12/29/2004, "Jim Munro" <jv...@ho...> wrote: >I get an extra CRLF in messages. >I am using Apache 1.3, PHP 4.3.3, IlohaMail 0.8.14-RC1, Slackware 9.1 >When I view the source, messages appear to have an extra CRLF after every >line. This holds true for encoded attachments. I seems to be only when >messages are displayed. The demo server renders the message OK. > >Any ideas? > >_________________________________________________________________ >Designer Mail isn't just fun to send, it's fun to receive. Use special >stationery, fonts and colors. >http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines > Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN(I.(B Premium right now and get the >first two months FREE*. > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ >_______________________________________________ >Ilohamail-testers mailing list >Ilo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers |
From: Jim M. <jv...@ho...> - 2004-12-29 05:44:52
|
I get an extra CRLF in messages. I am using Apache 1.3, PHP 4.3.3, IlohaMail 0.8.14-RC1, Slackware 9.1 When I view the source, messages appear to have an extra CRLF after every line. This holds true for encoded attachments. I seems to be only when messages are displayed. The demo server renders the message OK. Any ideas? _________________________________________________________________ Designer Mail isn't just fun to send, it's fun to receive. Use special stationery, fonts and colors. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*. |
From: Jim M. <jv...@ho...> - 2004-12-29 05:24:08
|
Messages have an extra CRLF and attached jpegs dont display inline. Tests OK on demo server. Currently using Slackware 9.1, PHP 4.3.3, IlohaMail 0.8.14-RC1, Apache 1.3 When I do view source, I get an extra CRLF in messages and encoded files but not on the demo server. _________________________________________________________________ Powerful Parental Controls Let your child discover the best the Internet has to offer. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*. |
From: Ryo C. <ry...@il...> - 2004-12-28 21:03:44
|
Basically the IMAP library hangs waiting for a response from the IMAP server, after sending it data. Either the IMAP server isn't returning the expected response, or there's something in the response that's confusing the code... Either way, I'll add some more debugging output in the next snapshot (which should be tonight), so the next time a user reports it, please send us the output you see (of it you don't see any difference). Ryo On 12/28/2004, "vlys" <vl...@ra...> wrote: >Hi > >Some users often get this message as they are sending an email, after a >60-second delay : >When I try to look at this, I never get such a message. > >******************* >... >..... >Sent! >Moving to send folder... >Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 60 seconds exceeded in >/home/rastamai/www/webmail/include/imap.inc on line 100 >******************* > >However emails are sent and copied to the Sent folder. System uses a >database backend. > >Where does it come from ??? > >Thanks >vlys from Rastamail.com > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ >_______________________________________________ >Ilohamail-testers mailing list >Ilo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers |
From: vlys <vl...@ra...> - 2004-12-28 20:14:19
|
Hi Some users often get this message as they are sending an email, after a 60-second delay : When I try to look at this, I never get such a message. ******************* ... ..... Sent! Moving to send folder... Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 60 seconds exceeded in /home/rastamai/www/webmail/include/imap.inc on line 100 ******************* However emails are sent and copied to the Sent folder. System uses a database backend. Where does it come from ??? Thanks vlys from Rastamail.com |
From: Tom C. <tc...@te...> - 2004-12-28 19:25:37
|
Thanks Ryo. Your product is VERY easy to setup unlike so many others. I was concerned the new features were going to change that. Great job. -Tom |
From: Ryo C. <ry...@il...> - 2004-12-28 18:53:10
|
That made me realize that the MySQL/0.9.0.sql file was missing the commands to update the cache table to the new schema.... oops. This'll be updated in the next nightly (the MySQL/sql file is up-to-date so look in there for the newest schema). OTOH, I would recommend using file-based caching anyway, so I think you're better off for now :-) Ryo On 12/28/2004, "Tom Conway" <tc...@te...> wrote: > >Got this working by commented out DB_CACHE_TABLE = "cache" in >db_conf.php > >I think my cache table is correct: > >+------------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ >| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | >+------------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ >| id | int(11) | | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | >| owner | int(11) | | MUL | 0 | | >| cache_key | varchar(64) | YES | MUL | NULL | | >| cache_data | text | YES | | NULL | | >+------------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ >_______________________________________________ >Ilohamail-testers mailing list >Ilo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers |
From: Tom C. <tc...@te...> - 2004-12-28 17:25:59
|
Got this working by commented out DB_CACHE_TABLE =3D "cache" in db_conf.php I think my cache table is correct: +------------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +------------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | id | int(11) | | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | owner | int(11) | | MUL | 0 | | | cache_key | varchar(64) | YES | MUL | NULL | | | cache_data | text | YES | | NULL | | +------------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ |
From: Ryo C. <ry...@il...> - 2004-12-27 23:10:10
|
Daniel, I don't see what the benefits of putting the "defaults" in a database would be. It would incur an additional DB query per page load (which is significantly slower than loading a PHP include), and it's also easier to modify the data directly in a file, rather than modify data that's in a database. Ryo On 12/25/2004, "nl" <nl...@it...> wrote: >Hi ML! > >Great software! > >What do you think about modularising the default settings storage to the >backend-scheme? > >Instead of storing the default colors and prefs hardcoded in the script >files, mightn't it be possible to let that be handled by the backend >mechanism like one time those values are stored in a "defaults"-file or >another time in the prefs and colors table (maybe with an additional >relation to a table where a server-to-default settings-preset could be >stored also...)? > > >Curious 'bout opinions... > > >Greetz, > >Daniel > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ >_______________________________________________ >Ilohamail-testers mailing list >Ilo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ilohamail-testers |