Re: [Ilisp-devel] ILISP 5.11

[Paolo A. <am...@mc...>]

On 11 Apr 2001 18:02:43 +0200, Matthias Koeppe
<mk...@sa...> wrote:

> I would go for $Id$. 

Agreed. Note that some files have old RCS/CVS headers.


> Well there already seems to be a tagging scheme (at least there is a
> tag ILISP-5-10-1), so you should simply tag everything with the
> ILISP-5-11 tag: 
[...]
> I wouldn't bump the release number to 6.

Agreed too. Marco: if you still decide on 6 instead of 5.11, don't forget
to update the version information in the documentation.


Paolo
-- 
EncyCMUCLopedia * Extensive collection of CMU Common Lisp documentation
http://cvs2.cons.org:8000/cmucl/doc/EncyCMUCLopedia/