Re: [Ijsql-devel] Re: Tasks and the like

[William G. <ww...@ts...>]

Hi, Peter --

> Just so I understand the scope of this document - do you want a "Visio"
type
> diagram which shows all major areas, or a system flow ... "class diagrm" -
> like with high level objects ...

I think a fairly simple class diagram would be fine for right now.  As you
say, the next step would be a "meatier" diagram.  We can expand it then.

> Also, I would assume that saving the result into an HTML file would be ok

HTML is perfect.  That way, everyone can look at it regardlesss of platform.

> do you have any ideas on the naming convention you would like for the
packages ?

Yeah, we've sort of run out of time on the package naming convention.  I
still have heard nothing from Sourceforge, so I'm going to make the decision
that we use my domain name, which is curiousmuse.com.  If Sourceforge ever
answers that yes, we can use the Sourceforge name in the package, we can
think about switching.  For now, how about something like:

[core code]
com.curiousmuse.ijsql.core;

    [jdbc/metadata code]
    com.curiousmuse.ijsql.core.db;

    [cross-db]
    com.curiousmuse.ijsql.core.xdb;

    [xml-related]
    com.curiousmuse.ijsql.core.xmltools;

    [any common utils]
    com.curiousmuse.ijsql.core.utils;

[presentation/view]
com.curiousmuse.ijsql.view;

    [console view]
    com.curiousmuse.ijsql.view.console;

    [gui view]
    com.curiousmuse.ijsql.view.gui;

    [servlet view]
    com.curiousmuse.ijsql.view.web;

This is off the top of my head; any comments, different opinions, or
objections are welcome.  Also, the above probably doesn't cover everything
...

Anyone out there a CVS wizard?  We need to restructure cvs to match the
package structure.  If noone else is already an expert, I'll dig into the
docs and do it.

Regards,
Bill Graham