From: Peter K. <pk...@ho...> - 2000-12-11 14:59:47
|
Bill, Just so I understand the scope of this document - do you want a "Visio" type diagram which shows all major areas, or a system flow ... "class diagrm" - like with high level objects ... Also, I would assume that saving the result into an HTML file would be ok not knowing all parties access to tools. Also, since the next step should be a diagram with some meat, do you have any ideas on the naming convention you would like for the packages ? Regards, Peter >From: "William Graham" <ww...@ts...> >To: "Peter Kasson" <pk...@ho...> >CC: <Ijs...@li...> >Subject: Re: Tasks and the like >Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 00:09:05 -0800 > >Hello, Peter -- > > > Yes, the cross-db stuff, xml, metadata and the like are probably a lot >for > > the first release. > >Well, the expansion of the metadata querying (task 3) should be easy; I've >already been thinking on that, and will add it in shortly. Jukka already >has the code for switchable multiple db connections. What other "major" >function or functions do you think we should target for initial release? > > > I would like to see code generation as well, and possibly options like >pool > > managers ... etc., but certainly for v.2 > >Once we define what's in this release, let's rough out a release list for >the next couple of versions. > > > I tried out the gui code in the CVS project, but only got the connect >panel. > > The code looks like it has a JTree and the like, but could not get it >up > > and running ... have you ? > >Not recently: I know that it does require a class from the borland jar file >that's also in cvs. Did you get that & put it in the classpath? I can try >to get it running myself soon, too. Also, I can get the "author", my >friend >Stefan, to give us a hand ;-) > > > Task distribution - how would this be done ? > >Not totally sure. I'd like to see if anyone has any areas they prefer to >work on. One area I want to keep working on is the basic console version, >since that's what I originally wrote, and what I use day-to-day at my work. >I'm hoping that others will just make their preferences / interests known, >and we can go from there. > > > I have 5+ databases at my office to work with, on Linux and NT (Oracle, > > SQL-Server, MySQL, Interbase (Inprise), JDataStore, MSAccess as well as > > other xBase type databases. I can do some development on these as well >as > > testing. > >Cool. I have Oracle and Mysql on Linux, and InstantDB on Linux and >Windows. >Sounds like we have a good range if things -- you just about have it all! >Anyone else have any other dbms or platforms available for test? > > > Should there be anything as elaborate as class diagrams, modeling and >the > > like being done here? I have all the tools necessary and would offer my > > services as documenter if others want to do upfront design or want to >lead. > > I can do the design of these things as well, but wonder if this is >overkill > > (at least a few high-level diagrams would be good I think). > >A class diagram, basic design, and perhaps a message flow diagram, will be >very nice as we separate into a MVC architecture (assuming that's the >approach we use to separate view from core code: other architecture >suggestions, anyone?), and as we add the sort of things you and Jukka are >talking about. I don't want us to go too "design-crazy", but don't want to >make the opposite mistake either. Let's see if anyone else has any >comments >about design, then we'll add some basic design tasks into the release >tasks. > >One thing I do want to do is get us to agree on some coding conventions. >I'd also like to go back and comment the code, and then require javadoc at >the beginning of each class and method. This will make maintenance and >expansion much easier in the future ... > >Thanks again for the input! Anyone else have comments / ideas / >objections?? > >Regards, >Bill Graham > _____________________________________________________________________________________ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com |