From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-06-21 18:26:28
|
Actionsfile feedback item #2808098, was opened at 2009-06-18 01:28 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by fabiankeil You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=460288&aid=2808098&group_id=11118 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: current actionsfile >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Dominique Schramm (netandroid) Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil) Summary: blocking sitecatalyst Initial Comment: sitecatalyst is not blocked actually by privoxy. the html source looks like this: <!--SiteCatalyst code version: G.7. Copyright 1997-2004 Omniture, Inc. More info available at http://www.omniture.com --> <script language="JavaScript"> <!-- var s_pageName=""; var s_server=""; var s_channel=""; var s_pageType=""; var s_prop1=""; var s_prop2=""; var s_prop3=""; var s_prop4=""; var s_prop5=""; var s_prop6=""; var s_prop7=""; var s_prop8="XX.XXX.XXX.XXX | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD alpha; de-AT; rv:1.9.1b4) Gecko/20090505 Firefox/3.5b4"; var s_prop9=""; var s_prop10=""; var s_prop11=""; var s_prop12=""; var s_prop13="URL"; var s_prop14=""; var s_prop15=""; var s_prop16=""; var s_prop19="False"; /* E-commerce Variables */ var s_campaign=""; var s_state=""; var s_zip=""; var s_events="event5"; var s_products=""; var s_purchaseID=""; var s_eVar1=""; var s_eVar2=""; var s_eVar3=""; var s_eVar4=""; var s_eVar5=""; var s_eVar22=""; var s_eVar23="False"; //--> </script> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil) Date: 2009-06-21 18:26 Message: Thanks for the additional information. The variables seem to be used by a script that gets loaded from http://i.cmpnet.com/shared/omniture/s_code_remote.js and I just committed a block rule for '/.*omniture.*\.js'. The variables itself should be harmless and we usually don't filter JavaScript code anyway as browser plugins are a lot better at this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dominique Schramm (netandroid) Date: 2009-06-21 13:27 Message: Hi, the url: http://www.informationweek.de/ i think filtering is interesting for privacy purposes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil) Date: 2009-06-20 18:10 Message: Thanks for the report. Can you post the URL where you think Privoxy should block or filter something but doesn't? The code you posted only initializes a bunch of variables, so I don't see why it should be filtered out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=460288&aid=2808098&group_id=11118 |