[Ieee80211-devel] Re: [PATCH 15/29] ieee80211 Renamed ieee80211_hdr to ieee80211_hdr_4addr

[Michael Wu <fla...@so...>]

(resend, don't know why kmail decided to send to oss.sgi.com)

This patch plus patch 5 looks very similar to my management frame patch 
except..

On Tuesday 13 September 2005 18:53, James Ketrenos wrote:
> @@ -552,6 +577,17 @@ struct ieee80211_authentication {
>  	struct ieee80211_info_element info_element[0];
>  } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> +struct ieee80211_disassoc {
Add alias for deauthentication frame here?

> +	struct ieee80211_hdr_3addr header;
> +	u16 reason_code;
If we do not append _code to "status", why append _code to "reason"?

> +	struct ieee80211_info_element info_element[0];
> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> +
> +struct ieee80211_probe_request {
> +	struct ieee80211_hdr_3addr header;
> +	struct ieee80211_info_element info_element[0];
> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> +
>  struct ieee80211_probe_response {
>  	struct ieee80211_hdr_3addr header;
>  	u32 time_stamp[2];
> @@ -560,14 +596,25 @@ struct ieee80211_probe_response {
>  	struct ieee80211_info_element info_element[0];
>  } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> -struct ieee80211_assoc_request_frame {
> +/* Alias beacon for probe_response */
> +#define ieee80211_beacon ieee80211_probe_response
> +
> +struct ieee80211_assoc_request {
> +	struct ieee80211_hdr_3addr header;
> +	u16 capability;
> +	u16 listen_interval;
> +	struct ieee80211_info_element info_element[0];
> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> +
> +struct ieee80211_reassoc_request {
> +	struct ieee80211_hdr_3addr header;
>  	__le16 capability;
>  	__le16 listen_interval;
>  	u8 current_ap[ETH_ALEN];
>  	struct ieee80211_info_element info_element[0];
>  } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> -struct ieee80211_assoc_response_frame {
> +struct ieee80211_assoc_response {
>  	struct ieee80211_hdr_3addr header;
>  	__le16 capability;
>  	__le16 status;