From: Arshad T. <ars...@sl...> - 2003-11-18 08:00:19
|
Is there any future for ids? I'm a huge fan, because it magically integrates with my iPhoto libraries and photo albums on my Mac. Here's what I like about IDS (and why I prefer it to alternatives such as Gallery): 1) Generates thumbnails and different sizes on demand - saving time and space for less frequently visited photos. 2) Does not involve a cumbersome upload process (like Gallery did) 3) Allows visitor to choose default image viewing size - and I don't have to do anything additional to shrink images for web serving 4) (the best one), with one simple symlink, ids magically is serving all of my iPhoto libraries. It's brilliant! I did nothing! (ln -s /Users/<username>/Pictures/iPhoto\ Library/Albums /Library/Webserver/Documents/<ids-folder>/albums) - as long as permissions are leniently set, this will work. Now, it looks like ids development has all but stagnated... hopefully I will have time to help - that is, if I'm not the lone remaining ids fan out there. The one big obstacle to getting ids to work on a Mac.... it had nothing to do with IDS. But getting ImageMagick and PerlMagick to work on the mac took me a couple of days the first time, and another 3 days to redo it with Panther (10.3). It was a royal PITA. Hopefully fink will take care of that when they update their ImageMagick package. -Arshad |