From: timduru <ti...@ti...> - 2003-08-12 08:41:59
|
> If you want your stuff integrated into the main stream > application, > you need to supply diffs of what you're doing. Not everyone knows how > to edit those files, and not everyone has the guts to even touch stuff > they don't quite understand. Diffs are a lot easier to apply for a > lot of people, and will also make live for us developers a lot easier. yes, but I thought juste replacing the function would be easier and more useable by JM Ulrich instead of having a diff that might fail. Replacing the entire function by hand seemed safer to me until I upgrade to 0.82 and make clean patches.. But JM found even a better solution :o) > It doesn't matter what version you've "patched" up, current or > old, > it can always be back (or fore) ported if needed, but you need to get > used to submitting diffs instead. Ok, well that's what I said in my first post, that if there was interest in some / all of the modifications that I would take the time to isolate most of them and make clean patches. But as I didn't really get many replies of interest, I just didn't do it yet. I preferred to deal with the ones who emailed me in private directly and give them my entire code and help them making the few configuration modifications. :) As I said in my first post, some of my modifications might not be of everyones interests, so I was more waiting for feedback / requests of what could/should be ported into the main stream. So what should I do ? make a huge diff on my version after including the 0.82 modifications ? Make one diff for all the small changes / bug fixes and another one for the pretty url modifications ? (as that last one is the modification that generates the most changes , might be better to have it separate ? ) or try to make one diff for every single change ? (might not be the easiest to integrate though, as diff after diff it'd get more and more difficult to merge as the code would change ? ) I'm not sure what you or others would prefer, what would be easier etc... Also Is there a way to make the diffs so that if applying one diff after the other it doesn't fail because the first diff have already modified the same file / code portion ? Do you still have the original ids-0.81.tgz btw ? I don't see it in the download area.. that way I could make a diff between 0.81 and 0.82 and include that in my version so I'm up to date with 0.82 to make the diffs on my modifications. thanks |