From: John M. <mo...@mu...> - 2001-02-15 00:30:47
|
Thanks. What is everybody's opinion on this? Is it worth requiring another package to do lossless rotations of JPEG's? I like the idea, but folks seem to have a lot of trouble installing IDS as it is. (I'll admit that my documentation is pretty sparse...) While we're on the subject- does anyone know of other image manipulation packages we should be looking at? I've often wondered if replacing ImageMagick with a more specialized program would make IDS noticably faster. Code profiling suggests that IDS spends most of its time in Image::Magick and the CGI lib. I chose ImageMagick because of its Perl interface- I've been trying to avoid making system calls. BTW, the later versions of ImageMagick do preserve EXIF data through manipulations. John on 2/14/01 6:36 PM, Anders Bandholm at And...@un... wrote: > Hi! > > First: Thanks for a great package. I really needed something of this sort, > and IDS seems to have the right level of sophistication: It seems to have > all the right features - and just those! > > And now a suggestion: > > Have you thought about using 'jpegtran' for rotations? jpegtran has the > benefit of allowing you make a lossless rotate since it manipulates the > image file directly without doing the decode/rotate/encode process. An > added benefit is that it has an option called 'copy all', which copies all > markers into the rotated image - and this actually preserves Exif data! > > On Debian, jpegtran is part of the libjpeg-progs package > > Cheers, > Anders > -- > Anders Bandholm, UNI-C, Aarhus > Email: And...@un... > Phone: (+45) 8937-6645 Fax: (+45) 8937-6677 ICQ: 20617502 > PGP: id=0x42691C89; fp=D7DF EF78 0C55 9E9B C9EA 3D07 6500 A1BB > > > _______________________________________________ > IDS-devel mailing list > IDS...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel > |