Is there any future for ids? I'm a huge fan, because it magically
integrates with my iPhoto libraries and photo albums on my Mac.
Here's what I like about IDS (and why I prefer it to alternatives such
as Gallery):
1) Generates thumbnails and different sizes on demand - saving time and
space for less frequently visited photos.
2) Does not involve a cumbersome upload process (like Gallery did)
3) Allows visitor to choose default image viewing size - and I don't
have to do anything additional to shrink images for web serving
4) (the best one), with one simple symlink, ids magically is serving
all of my iPhoto libraries. It's brilliant! I did nothing!
(ln -s /Users/<username>/Pictures/iPhoto\ Library/Albums
/Library/Webserver/Documents/<ids-folder>/albums)
- as long as permissions are leniently set, this will work.
Now, it looks like ids development has all but stagnated... hopefully I
will have time to help - that is, if I'm not the lone remaining ids fan
out there.
The one big obstacle to getting ids to work on a Mac.... it had nothing
to do with IDS. But getting ImageMagick and PerlMagick to work on the
mac took me a couple of days the first time, and another 3 days to redo
it with Panther (10.3). It was a royal PITA. Hopefully fink will
take care of that when they update their ImageMagick package.
-Arshad
|