Our plan in the very near future is to record PURLs such as these (and other URIs) to provide a URI interconversion service through identifiers.org URIs. In general, at the moment, we tend to record primarily the final resolving locations.
We are sorry that your request did not return any expected result. Here is a list of possible reasons:
Your requested term has been deprecated
The ontology that contains the term has not been updated
Whoops! Our program has an unhandled and unexpected error in processing your request."
I hope that clarifies things a little, but feel free to contact us if you have any further questions.
cheers,
Nick
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Looks like there is a problem with OntoBee - Oliver can you fix?
If identifiers.org points at the PURL we can start to get an exact
number for the % uptime which would be useful for us.
Nick, I would prefer the PURL was registered as that way I don't have to
change things twice if we end up using a different resolver
On 22 Apr 2014, at 3:50, Nick Juty wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your query.
Our plan in the very near future is to record PURLs such as these (and
other URIs) to provide a URI interconversion service through
identifiers.org URIs. In general, at the moment, we tend to record
primarily the final resolving locations.
We are sorry that your request did not return any expected result.
Here is a list of possible reasons:
Your requested term has been deprecated
The ontology that contains the term has not been updated
Whoops! Our program has an unhandled and unexpected error in
processing your request."
I hope that clarifies things a little, but feel free to contact us if
you have any further questions.
The Ontobee virtuoso database was broken last midnight when it was trying to upload the newest version of GO and failed.
I have resumed it now. It should be fine now.
Thanks,
Oliver
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Mungall [mailto:cjmungall@lbl.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 10:41 AM
To: [identifiers-org:new-collection]; He, Yongqun
Subject: Re: [identifiers-org:new-collection] #16 Uberon PURLs
Looks like there is a problem with OntoBee - Oliver can you fix?
If identifiers.org points at the PURL we can start to get an exact number for the % uptime which would be useful for us.
Nick, I would prefer the PURL was registered as that way I don't have to change things twice if we end up using a different resolver
On 22 Apr 2014, at 3:50, Nick Juty wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your query.
Our plan in the very near future is to record PURLs such as these (and
other URIs) to provide a URI interconversion service through
identifiers.org URIs. In general, at the moment, we tend to record
primarily the final resolving locations.
We are sorry that your request did not return any expected result.
Here is a list of possible reasons:
Your requested term has been deprecated The ontology that contains
the term has not been updated Whoops! Our program has an unhandled
and unexpected error in processing your request."
I hope that clarifies things a little, but feel free to contact us if
you have any further questions.
Thanks for getting back to me, and to Oliver for fixing the OntoBee issue.
I was about to do as you requested, and add the OBO PURL for UBERON, but I have run into a problem; can you tell me if the official UBERON identifier derived from 'UBERON:' or 'UBERON_'? Right now we have OLS and BioPortal using a colon, and OntoBee using an underscore. The Registry entry has it listed with a colon. I guess as lead developer, you should have the final say.
I'd be grateful to hear any suggestions you may have that would assist us in getting your PURL listed.
cheers
Nick
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Thanks for getting back to me, and to Oliver for fixing the OntoBee
issue.
I was about to do as you requested, and add the OBO PURL for UBERON,
but I have run into a problem; can you tell me if the official UBERON
identifier derived from 'UBERON:' or 'UBERON_'? Right now we have OLS
and BioPortal using a colon, and OntoBee using an underscore. The
Registry entry has it listed with a colon. I guess as lead developer,
you should have the final say.
I'd be grateful to hear any suggestions you may have that would assist
us in getting your PURL listed.
Thanks for getting back to me. I've seen that documentation, but
unfortunately it does not really help me. I can add UBERON with
identifiers using 'UBERON:', which will work for OLS and BioPortal
instances, but not for you. Or vice versa, if I add the underscore
version, they will work for only you.
Is there any chance that you could implement something that can handle the
colon version on your side?
Thanks for getting back to me, and to Oliver for fixing the OntoBee
issue.
I was about to do as you requested, and add the OBO PURL for UBERON,
but I have run into a problem; can you tell me if the official UBERON
identifier derived from 'UBERON:' or 'UBERON_'? Right now we have OLS
and BioPortal using a colon, and OntoBee using an underscore. The
Registry entry has it listed with a colon. I guess as lead developer,
you should have the final say.
I'd be grateful to hear any suggestions you may have that would assist
us in getting your PURL listed.
In this case, I am wondering if you can make some mapping or other update in your site to make it fit to the two scenarios.
Best,
Oliver
From: Nick Juty [mailto:njuty@users.sf.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 7:53 PM
To: [identifiers-org:new-collection]
Subject: [identifiers-org:new-collection] Re: #16 Uberon PURLs
Hi Chris,
Thanks for getting back to me. I've seen that documentation, but
unfortunately it does not really help me. I can add UBERON with
identifiers using 'UBERON:', which will work for OLS and BioPortal
instances, but not for you. Or vice versa, if I add the underscore
version, they will work for only you.
Is there any chance that you could implement something that can handle the
colon version on your side?
Thanks for getting back to me, and to Oliver for fixing the OntoBee
issue.
I was about to do as you requested, and add the OBO PURL for UBERON,
but I have run into a problem; can you tell me if the official UBERON
identifier derived from 'UBERON:' or 'UBERON_'? Right now we have OLS
and BioPortal using a colon, and OntoBee using an underscore. The
Registry entry has it listed with a colon. I guess as lead developer,
you should have the final say.
I'd be grateful to hear any suggestions you may have that would assist
us in getting your PURL listed.
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your query.
Our plan in the very near future is to record PURLs such as these (and other URIs) to provide a URI interconversion service through identifiers.org URIs. In general, at the moment, we tend to record primarily the final resolving locations.
The other thing, that I have found this on a fairly frequent basis, is that your URL does not work. It gets redirected to http://www.ontobee.org/browser/rdf.php?o=UBERON&iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0007225, which gives the message:
"Term Not Found
We are sorry that your request did not return any expected result. Here is a list of possible reasons:
I hope that clarifies things a little, but feel free to contact us if you have any further questions.
cheers,
Nick
Looks like there is a problem with OntoBee - Oliver can you fix?
If identifiers.org points at the PURL we can start to get an exact
number for the % uptime which would be useful for us.
Nick, I would prefer the PURL was registered as that way I don't have to
change things twice if we end up using a different resolver
On 22 Apr 2014, at 3:50, Nick Juty wrote:
Related
Request new collection: #16
The Ontobee virtuoso database was broken last midnight when it was trying to upload the newest version of GO and failed.
I have resumed it now. It should be fine now.
Thanks,
Oliver
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Mungall [mailto:cjmungall@lbl.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 10:41 AM
To: [identifiers-org:new-collection]; He, Yongqun
Subject: Re: [identifiers-org:new-collection] #16 Uberon PURLs
Looks like there is a problem with OntoBee - Oliver can you fix?
If identifiers.org points at the PURL we can start to get an exact number for the % uptime which would be useful for us.
Nick, I would prefer the PURL was registered as that way I don't have to change things twice if we end up using a different resolver
On 22 Apr 2014, at 3:50, Nick Juty wrote:
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
Related
Request new collection: #16
Hi Chris,
Thanks for getting back to me, and to Oliver for fixing the OntoBee issue.
I was about to do as you requested, and add the OBO PURL for UBERON, but I have run into a problem; can you tell me if the official UBERON identifier derived from 'UBERON:' or 'UBERON_'? Right now we have OLS and BioPortal using a colon, and OntoBee using an underscore. The Registry entry has it listed with a colon. I guess as lead developer, you should have the final say.
I'd be grateful to hear any suggestions you may have that would assist us in getting your PURL listed.
cheers
Nick
Hi Nick,
See
http://oboformat.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/obo-syntax.html
For how OBO identifiers are mapped to URIs
On 22 Apr 2014, at 8:56, Nick Juty wrote:
Related
Request new collection: #16
Hi Chris,
Thanks for getting back to me. I've seen that documentation, but
unfortunately it does not really help me. I can add UBERON with
identifiers using 'UBERON:', which will work for OLS and BioPortal
instances, but not for you. Or vice versa, if I add the underscore
version, they will work for only you.
Is there any chance that you could implement something that can handle the
colon version on your side?
cheers
Nick
Related
Request new collection: #16
Hi Nick,
In this case, I am wondering if you can make some mapping or other update in your site to make it fit to the two scenarios.
Best,
Oliver
From: Nick Juty [mailto:njuty@users.sf.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 7:53 PM
To: [identifiers-org:new-collection]
Subject: [identifiers-org:new-collection] Re: #16 Uberon PURLs
Hi Chris,
Thanks for getting back to me. I've seen that documentation, but
unfortunately it does not really help me. I can add UBERON with
identifiers using 'UBERON:', which will work for OLS and BioPortal
instances, but not for you. Or vice versa, if I add the underscore
version, they will work for only you.
Is there any chance that you could implement something that can handle the
colon version on your side?
cheers
Nick
Hi Nick,
See
http://oboformat.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/obo-syntax.html
For how OBO identifiers are mapped to URIs
On 22 Apr 2014, at 8:56, Nick Juty wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for getting back to me, and to Oliver for fixing the OntoBee
issue.
I was about to do as you requested, and add the OBO PURL for UBERON,
but I have run into a problem; can you tell me if the official UBERON
identifier derived from 'UBERON:' or 'UBERON_'? Right now we have OLS
and BioPortal using a colon, and OntoBee using an underscore. The
Registry entry has it listed with a colon. I guess as lead developer,
you should have the final say.
I'd be grateful to hear any suggestions you may have that would assist
us in getting your PURL listed.
cheers
Nick
[new-collection:#16]http://sourceforge.net/p/identifiers-org/new-collection/16/ Uberon PURLs
Status: open
Created: Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:07 PM UTC by Chris Mungall
Last Updated: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:50 AM UTC
Owner: nobody
I'm the lead developer of uberon
When I go here
http://info.identifiers.org/uberon/UBERON:0007225
I see links to OLS and BioPortal, but not to the official PURL,
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0007225
Can you add this?
Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in
https://sourceforge.net/p/identifiers-org/new-collection/16/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
[new-collection:#16]http://sourceforge.net/p/identifiers-org/new-collection/16/ Uberon PURLs
Status: open
Created: Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:07 PM UTC by Chris Mungall
Last Updated: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:50 AM UTC
Owner: nobody
I'm the lead developer of uberon
When I go here
http://info.identifiers.org/uberon/UBERON:0007225
I see links to OLS and BioPortal, but not to the official PURL,
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0007225
Can you add this?
Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in
https://sourceforge.net/p/identifiers-org/new-collection/16/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
[new-collection:#16]http://sourceforge.net/p/identifiers-org/new-collection/16/ Uberon PURLs
Status: open
Created: Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:07 PM UTC by Chris Mungall
Last Updated: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:50 AM UTC
Owner: nobody
I'm the lead developer of uberon
When I go here
http://info.identifiers.org/uberon/UBERON:0007225
I see links to OLS and BioPortal, but not to the official PURL, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0007225
Can you add this?
Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/identifiers-org/new-collection/16/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
Related
Request new collection: #16