Hi Michał,
On 10/8/22 20:49, Michał Szczepaniak wrote:
> Thinklight has only two values, on/off so it's reasonable for max_brightness to be 0 and 1 as if you write anything between 0 and 255 it will be 255 anyway so there's no point for it to be 255.
>
> Also sorry for repeated messages, I got no reply so I'm trying to figure out what I did wrong.
Your patch is missing a Signed-off-by line in the commit-message. I can only
accept patches with a Signed-off-by line in the commit-message like this:
Signed-off-by: Your Real Name <em...@yo...main>
See:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin
Also your patch is malformed (it has been reflowed by your email client)
and it does not apply properly.
Since this is only a trivial single line change I've just manually recreated
the patch myself, with me as author to avoid the S-o-b problem.
I have given you credit by adding:
Reported-by: Michał Szczepaniak <m.s...@gm...>
to the commit message of the patch.
Regards,
Hans
>
>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index 22d4e8633e30e9..775c2f327dc3a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -5562,6 +5562,7 @@ static enum led_brightness light_sysfs_get(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
> static struct tpacpi_led_classdev tpacpi_led_thinklight = {
> .led_classdev = {
> .name = "tpacpi::thinklight",
> + .max_brightness = 1,
> .brightness_set_blocking = &light_sysfs_set,
> .brightness_get = &light_sysfs_get,
> }
>
>
>
>
|