|
From: Andy S. <and...@gm...> - 2020-04-22 13:50:29
|
+Cc: people who lately involved in 2nd fan discussions here and there Lars, also one question regarding the code below. On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:15 PM Lars <la...@ap...> wrote: > > This patch allows controlling multiple fans as if they were a single fan. > > This adds P52, P72, X1E, and X1E gen2 to dual fan quirks. Both fans are controlled together. > > Tested on an X1 Extreme Gen2. > > The patch is defensive, it adds only specific supported machines, and falls back to the old behavior if both fans cannot be controlled. > However, it does attempt single fan control for all previously white-listed Thinkpads. > > Background: > I tested the BIOS default behavior on my X1E gen2 and both fans are always changed together. > So rather than adding controls for each fan, this controls both fans together as the BIOS would do. > > This was inspired by a discussion on dual fan support for the thinkfan tool (https://github.com/vmatare/thinkfan/issues/58). > (Thanks to Github users voidworker, and civic9.) > > The BIOS ids for P52/P72 and X1E are taken from there. The X1E gen2 id is verified on my machine. > > (In the first version my mail client botched the white-spacing - my apologies, this is my first Kernel patch. Used git send-email and gmail this time.) > > Signed-off-by: Lars <la...@ap...> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > index 8eaadbaf8ffa..cbc0e85d89d2 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > @@ -8324,11 +8324,20 @@ static int fan_set_level(int level) > > switch (fan_control_access_mode) { > case TPACPI_FAN_WR_ACPI_SFAN: > - if (level >= 0 && level <= 7) { > - if (!acpi_evalf(sfan_handle, NULL, NULL, "vd", level)) > - return -EIO; > - } else > + if (((level < 0) || (level > 7))) > return -EINVAL; > + > + if (tp_features.second_fan) { > + if (!fan_select_fan2() || > + !acpi_evalf(sfan_handle, NULL, NULL, "vd", level)) { > + fan_select_fan1(); > + pr_warn("Couldn't set 2nd fan level, disabling support\n"); > + tp_features.second_fan = 0; > + } > + fan_select_fan1(); > + } > + if (!acpi_evalf(sfan_handle, NULL, NULL, "vd", level)) > + return -EIO; > break; > > case TPACPI_FAN_WR_ACPI_FANS: > @@ -8345,6 +8354,16 @@ static int fan_set_level(int level) > else if (level & TP_EC_FAN_AUTO) > level |= 4; /* safety min speed 4 */ > > + if (tp_features.second_fan) { > + if (!fan_select_fan2() || > + !acpi_ec_write(fan_status_offset, level)) { > + fan_select_fan1(); (1) > + pr_warn("Couldn't set 2nd fan level, disabling support\n"); > + tp_features.second_fan = 0; > + } > + fan_select_fan1(); (2) I'm not sure I got a logic behind this. Why do you need to call it twice? > + > + } > if (!acpi_ec_write(fan_status_offset, level)) > return -EIO; > else > @@ -8771,6 +8790,9 @@ static const struct tpacpi_quirk fan_quirk_table[] __initconst = { > TPACPI_QEC_IBM('7', '0', TPACPI_FAN_Q1), > TPACPI_QEC_LNV('7', 'M', TPACPI_FAN_2FAN), > TPACPI_Q_LNV('N', '1', TPACPI_FAN_2FAN), > + TPACPI_Q_LNV3('N', '2', 'C', TPACPI_FAN_2FAN), /* P52 / P72 */ > + TPACPI_Q_LNV3('N', '2', 'E', TPACPI_FAN_2FAN), /* X1 Extreme (1st gen) */ > + TPACPI_Q_LNV3('N', '2', 'O', TPACPI_FAN_2FAN), /* X1 Extreme (2nd gen) */ > }; > > static int __init fan_init(struct ibm_init_struct *iibm) > @@ -8812,8 +8834,7 @@ static int __init fan_init(struct ibm_init_struct *iibm) > fan_quirk1_setup(); > if (quirks & TPACPI_FAN_2FAN) { > tp_features.second_fan = 1; > - dbg_printk(TPACPI_DBG_INIT | TPACPI_DBG_FAN, > - "secondary fan support enabled\n"); > + pr_info("secondary fan support enabled\n"); > } > } else { > pr_err("ThinkPad ACPI EC access misbehaving, fan status and control unavailable\n"); > -- > 2.25.2 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko |
