Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] CONFIG_IBM_BAY

[Kristen C. A. <kri...@in...>]

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:39:00 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hm...@hm...> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Len Brown wrote:
> > > +config ACPI_IBM_BAY
> > 
> > Should this depend on ACPI_BAY=n?
> 
> It should allow both as modules, so that the user can choose which one to
> run.

Doesn't this option enable support for controlling the bay device via ibm_acpi?
If so - if you compile this one, then the user who chooses to use bay.ko instead
to control the bay can not use ibm_acpi at all to control the remaining
functionality.  I feel this should be dependent on ACPI_BAY=n.