|
From: Alex D. <ale...@gm...> - 2007-03-14 19:02:34
|
On 3/14/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hm...@hm...> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On 3/13/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hm...@hm...> wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > > I vote for "thinkpad_*", since "tp_" seems too ambiguous. Iis there > > > > > any concrete collision? > > > > > > > > I prefer thinkpad_* as well. > > > > > > Ok, what about thinkpad-laptop/thinkpad_laptop ? > > > > seems a bit redundant, but still better than tp. > > It is, as thinkpad implies laptop. > > We will probably also have snd_thinkpad, for the ALSA module (if I make it > into its own module, which is probably a very good idea). > > I'd jump in and get thinkpad_acpi for most of the stuff in ibm-acpi, but the > problem is that there used to exist an thinkpad-acpi module, by Erik > Rigtorp. It never made it to mainline (I just checked, it is not in 2.6.9, > and ibm-acpi was added in 2.6.10 and completely superseeded Erik's module > which only did hotkeys). > > I guess I can retake the name without too much problems after so long and > since it never made it to mainline AND it was not widely used, but still... > > What do you guys think? > Sounds like a good plan to me. Alex |
