From: Michael V. D. <mic...@va...> - 2004-11-02 04:03:18
|
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 16:58:02 -0600, "Michael Van Donselaar" <mi...@va...> wrote: <snip> >Am I misunderstanding this, or ought ilbc not be allowed implicitly? OK, so I should have looked at the source before posting. It looks like we need an ifdef to add iLBC to the capabilities if it is = is compiled in. My question to everyone is: Should iLBC replace speex as the default = preferred codec when available, or leave speex the default preferred codec, and = just add iLBC to the allowed list? |