From: Steve K. <st...@st...> - 2004-05-20 17:53:10
|
Chris G. Nicholas wrote: >If this is already done, packaged, and reasonably priced, and can still work with the other free iax clients and servers, sounds like a way to go... > >Can you provide more info on this setup? > > Unfortunately, our solution is not for sale, but you can probably find other similar solutions with your friend google: I think zebedee does this; it can even encrypt/compress things [compression probably not too helpful]. http://www.winton.org.uk/zebedee/ Also This might work: http://tunnel.mrq3.com/ >thanks! >Chris > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Steve Kann [mailto:st...@st...] >Sent: Thu 5/20/2004 9:23 AM >To: Chris G. Nicholas >Cc: iax...@li... >Subject: Re: [Iaxclient-devel] firewalls and TCP connections ... ? >Chris G. Nicholas wrote: > > > >>just learning about Asterix; cool! >> >>Apologies in advance if this has been answered before. >> >>Even though I fully realize TCP/IP connections suck compared to UDP for streaming media, unfortunately the only port one can generally count on, particularly at industry conferences, is outbound port 80 using TCP connections from behind a NAT. (hence the famous John Walker 'speakfree' end-of-life lament...) >> >>Just wondering if anyone has thought about the feasibility of a TCP connection option in iaxclient, initially just connecting to an external/simple/stupid tunnel proxy that turns around and connects to an Asterix PBX, or even just building in port 80/TCP support into Asterix itself... >> >> >> >> > >Actually, we do IAX over either straight TCP, or actual rfc-compliant >HTTP. > >Unfortunately, we do this with a proprietary program [external to >iaxclient], and can't release it, but I think there are similar >solutions available. They don't need to be built into iaxclient to use >them. The same reasons that make IAX work well with NATs make it work >fine with tunnels as well. > > >So basically, what you need to do is this: > > Client machine >Network Server >[Iaxclient <-UDP-> tunnel ] [<- HTTP or TCP -> ] [ tunnel<-UDP-> asterisk ] > >The tunnel programs at either side are what you need, and it needs to >support UDP tunneling. > >-SteveK > > > > > > |